Customize

'We Still Run This' - down (up again)

Discussion in 'Youtube and Vimeo Problems' started by Mutante, Jan 7, 2009.

  1. Mutante Member

    'We Still Run This' - down (up again)

    Copyright claim by Gary Scarf.

    Edit: The Church0fScientology channel copy.
  2. FraggedMind Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Disregard, cocks and such.

    TL:DR-Couterclaim nao!
  3. nonnonanon Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Ling redacted
  4. not shure Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    After seeing him yesterday, I doubt it was Gary.
  5. nonnonanon Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Heh, I doubt it also. But it's either an extreme coincidence or someone [who ain't that Gary, or any Gary most likely] is playing devious games.
  6. not shure Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    I don't think its a coincident either, I looks to me to be fully postulated.
  7. gregg Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Here is the email I got:

  8. R2D2 Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    it sure wasn't gary

    other copies are still up and running as far as i've seen
  9. R2D2 Member

  10. Silver Scream Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    I really doubt that it was Gary...would he do something like that?
  11. King Nerd Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    I'm confused. Is this the Max Headroom vid from a few months ago, or the one that was being drawn up in a thread a few weeks ago.

    Brb, moar beer.

    *serious post though.
  12. R2D2 Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    the new one
  13. King Nerd Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    OH FUCK! I never even got to see it. :(
  14. PAnonA Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    [STRIKE]Trying to upload the new video now under a different name. taking forever[/STRIKE]

    Diregard that. I suck cawks.

    Uploaded now by the way and in processing.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1P4cESivUg[/ame]


    edit2: ^^ video got rejected in processing for Rejected (terms of use violation)
  15. Mutante Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Several copies are still up on Youtube but the Church0fScientology channel copy with around 10,000 views in a handful of days has been taken down. So you can still see it on Youtube if you search for 'We Still Run This'.
  16. King Nerd Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Bastards!
  17. R2D2 Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

  18. anon0004 Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    then man the tubes, rutube, vimeo etc...
  19. Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Scarff is actually spelled with two F's, no?

    Not like we really needed more evidence that it wasn't really him, just saying.
  20. AnonLover Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    right, and he was at the riverside supervisors deal for most of the day yesterday. he did half decently so he of been preparing for it beforehand and busy.

    gregg plox confirm you counter-claim that shit?

    this reaks of oschaper-style tactics... he/they didnt get stopped after the massive takedown, stopped engaging with us directly yet targeted takedowns w/ moxon vids continuned. now that they/he got the false dmca down to a science, they went after our biggest target obviously trying to stop the next viral sensation.

    and they/he/who ever has gotten away with so many now their ego got the best of 'em by trying for a double whammy - get the vid and start infighting against smurf
  21. R2D2 Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    try this(different codec&size):

    WSRT.avi
  22. Hombre Moderator Skandinaviska

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    That's not how you spell Garry Scarff...

    my bet is on OSA - fucking idiots can't even spell his name right. Failtrolls.
  23. FYIANON Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Stupid question time: Besides reloading this can we do anythign else to help?
  24. themadhair Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    I just received a copyright claim from Francois Choquette. Name sound familiar no?

    The email address -> happysmurfla@aol.com

    Massive harpoon going to YouTube but, legally speaking, they don't have to respond if I don't cough up personal details.

    Need counter strategy.
  25. Your Mom Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    "If you want to make a video go viral, make a big show of yanking it off the internet"
  26. PAnonA Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    counter is easy to this. There is no name on this video at all, there is nothing on this video that shows it belongs to a certain person.

    I dont know how jewtube cannot see this, but it's been wrong from the start in more ways then one.
  27. Hombre Moderator Skandinaviska

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    This is OSA tactics to make us fight with eachother, divide and conquer.

    Do not fall for it.
  28. DarthXenu Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    The problem is this is an automated process. YouTube does not even review the vids they take down.

    How did we get the Tom Cruise video to stick again?
  29. PAnonA Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down



    keep getting upload errors. So it's a noshow on that file.

    Plus it may be what the video's title, description, and tags are that is getting the DMCA abuse against it.
  30. ARC Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Counterclaim. Use a willing namefag's contact details to contact you through, and call shenanigans on the claim also.


    Also don't fall for attempts to cause infighting.
  31. Relyt Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    I got an idea. If YouTube doesn't respond to a counter-claim, threaten a lawlsuit. They seem to only respond if a lawlsuit is involved. Then again, this could just be the beer talking...
  32. fotoanon Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    I don't think anyone here believes smurf or AO would do this sort of thing....
  33. gregg Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    They didnt. I got word from Gary. It was not him.
  34. themadhair Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    You may be missing the real problem here. Counter-claiming gives up your dox to the cult. YT do not have to do anything unless you counter-claim.

    So in order to fight a takedown you have to have to give up your dox.
  35. Anonypeg Member

  36. auchraw Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    This video was obviously confrontational, so no-one need be surprised that it has been taken down. This is predictably going to happen more often so why do we keep using YouTube?
  37. anonymized Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Because... people use JewTube.
  38. themadhair Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Erm....no it won't. YT have a disposable email address and false name - so there is no evidence to tie this to anybody.
  39. ARC Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    Or some namefagged anon's who is acting as your agent. You just have to authorize them to act on your behalf, and they can counterclaim for you. Any volunteer namefags? Or just contact a namefagged anon you know.
  40. gregg Member

    Re: 'We Still Run This' - down

    The person who is in control of the account, me, happens to be a namefag. I will be filling out the counter-claim tonight to send in.

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins