That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

/i/ - Internet 8 Machine

Gentlemen, as you may or may not know, the raid on acos.tv was called off due to boredom.

Dr. Oliver Schaper was obviously disgruntled, as seen on the interview he had with Wikinews (now ancient history). However, his bullshit continues. Anonymous must not tolerate this, but I surely don't recommend anything we did in the last raid.

What I am saying is this. Ollie has not learned his lesson. He continues to pull our videos on his fake DMCA claims, and simply will not stop. The BW Raeps of his websites seemed only to slow him down... and as seen before, a new war requires new tactics.

This is my proposal. Ollie is a Scientologist, and obviously one of OSA's zoophilia-lapdogs. It is time to strike a blow against OSA, and a grievous one at that. Because Ollie has been the biggest thorn in our side - and actually has committed crimes - he will be our target for Project NO U - RFG (Reverse Fair Game).

Ever since he had started up again, I spent three nights planning, and I came up with the following ops, both Blackhat and Moralfag versions. Feast your eyes, /i/nsurgents.

Blackhat Ops: Operation CP (crackpot) Crackdown
I know this will involve some hackers-on-steroids shit, so I am fully prepared to take infraction points. However, please note that this is for a GOOD CAUSE, and will harm absolutely nothing. It is purely to get through a filter, and nothing illegal will be done. If anything, it's just morally wrong.
Objectives:

1. First, we will use our Hackers On Steroids to crack past the filters of Peephole.tv. Shouldn't be that hard.
2. Next, we will scan ALL of his videos, tags, viewing, etc. to check for CP.
3. Then, we will check his history of videos he had had up before, in case he baleeted them.
4. If CP is found, then we contact Child Services, and report him as a CP peddler.
5. Ollie gets v&.
6. Congrats! We now have a whole new type of ammunition against the Cult, as child pornographers.
7. ????
8. PROFIT!!!

Now, for the Moralfag Operation.

Whitehat Ops: Operation Legal Shitstorm
Ollie has committed more crimes than any of us can count. He has fired perjury harpoons aimed at his foot for the past few months, and now, it is time to press charges.

1. First, we need Graham Berry, or maybe Martin. Any kind of lawyer that would represent a namefagged Anon who has been targeted by fraudulent DMCA faggotry.
2. Next, we get said lawyer to contact the EFF, and see how their investigation is going along.
3. After that, we must take ALL documented evidence we have, including DMCA claims made by Ollie himself or by any of his companies, and present it to a Federal Judge.
4. After that, we file charges in a federal court. DMCA fraud is a CRIME, as is perjury. If we can file charges, one of two things will happen: A, he'll go to jail, nothing of value was lost, etc; or B, the Scilons will try to bail him out. If this happens, it will be solid proof that the whole thing was perpetrated by OSA, which, at the very least, is harpoon material.

Of course, we COULD just go back to pizza bombs and BW raeps, but let's not do anything illegal, kay?

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

fap fap fap lol !

Whitehat Ops: Operation Legal Shitstorm, finance??

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

I had a feeling Graham or Martin would help for free.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

This we have to look into. My Avatar should make my attitude towards Dr.Oschaper quite clear.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

*Mindgasm*, its so beautiful. If it works out perfectly then Profit doesn't even describe it.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Yeah. We need to find a lawfag.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Now.. as someone who had my videos DMCA'ed by Ollie. I'm definitely sympathetic to whats happening. However, the Blackhat op you've listed out there concerns me. Guys.. now is not the time to foot bullet ourselves. The black hat stuff definitely is of concern to me and I think that should maybe be reconsidered as it could backfire and I think this needs to kept legal and ethical. Yep.. I'm definitely a moralfag.

The legal stuff. That should definitely be explored.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

^ moralfag, etc.

But I see what you mean. We should start compiling ALL evidence that points the finger at Ollie.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

go Legal with Mr.Graham Berry and or Mr.Martin

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

The Shadow wholly endorses BOTH operations.

In the meantime, since Ollie has managed to remove practically ALL 'Oschaper videos' from YouTube, I thought I'd get them back up there. And to make things harder for him/piss him off, I have made 10 (so far) sockpuppet accounts and am uploading my videos to each of them. Search 'scientology criminal tustin' (for example) to view the results. If, like The Shadow, you have no life and don't mind staying up until 4.30am, then why not try it yourself? 10 sockpuppet accounts, stick all your Ollie vids on them.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

im gonna say this once...

COMPILE THE EVIDENCE AND SEND IT TO THE LAW FAGS!

the more info and shit we got the stronger the case!
MAKE IT STICK YOU BAD ASS MOTHER FUCKERS
MAKE IT STICK!!!

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

You left out running macros that got him sent loads of free copies of the Qu'Ran, which The Shadow was most certainly not involved in

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Bwahahahaha!!!!! I just went to check on the newest $cilon vids on youtube and the whole front page is OSchaper videos!!!!!!!! They just keep on getting put up!

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

I'm in the "I've been DMCAed and am sympathetic" category, as most of you know. So, let me play Devil's Advocate on this:

Schaper told me that the reason he started the latest round of takedowns was because of Shadow's implication of CP involvement. This is a big-time hot button. Unfortunately, it's also a dead end. Anyone involved in any type of porn has to have 2257 documentation on all the "performers". This is federally-mandated. This isn't like it was twenty years ago, when Traci Lords got into the business with a fake drivers' license and got away with it. The stuff on the 2257 is background-checked by the employer prior to anyone getting in front of a camera. The 2257s have to be kept on file with a registrar, which has to be publicly listed. If a company decides to fake it, or they don't have it on file, it's not only v& for CP, it's big-time v& and confiscation of assets for falsifying government paperwork. At that point, it's not only the Partyvan that's on you, it's the IRS, the SEC, and, in Ollie's case, the FCC.

No one with any connection to porn is going to risk CP, falsifying documentation, and confiscation of assets. They take very special care these days on that paperwork.

To bring this down to this situation, Ollie went into a total panic over the mere accusation of CP. If someone scans those vids and spots potential loli/shota and contacts the Partyvan, all Ollie has to do is show the feds the 2257 for that performer. The Feds will cross-check the info on it as well. If it scans clean, no charges, and anything that we might bring against him after that will be seen as crying wolf. It'll have the same effect as the Scilons constantly calling the cops on us. We'll be ignored.

Would Ollie risk faking a 2257? I don't think so. PeepholeTV makes up only a small amount of ACOS's revenue. He'd be risking his non-adult-oriented adventures for only a small increase in earnings. The risk isn't worth the reward.

I'm not saying not to do it if you want to. I'm saying that it's going to be hard as hell to get anything on him.

Now, as to the whitehat op:

1) Ollie told me that the photograph used in Shadow's videos is copyrighted. There is a watermark on it, but it's very small. It's SOP for ACOS to do that to any and all photographic materials connected to it, including Ollie's photos, and he supposedly has the dox. If this is the case, the takedowns with his name on them for DMCA purposes were legitimate. He was willing to go to court, and he did notify YouTube that he was willing to do so.

2) Ollie denies any connection to ARC and the other company that was involved in the September 3rd mass takedown.

2a) Ollie also denies any connection between OSA and ARC, etc. He told me that OSA called him in for a talk, wondering if he was behind it.

2b) Ollie told me that he believed that responsibility for the September 3rd takedowns lies with /b/ and/or /i/. I told him I was skeptical of this because it wasn't their style.

2c) Take 2) through 2b) with any amount of skepticism you wish. I'm just telling you what he told me.

3) The text-only and "adapted work" videos are being taken down by YouTube on their own volition as TOS violations. Due to the nature of the letter that Ollie sent YT in regard to Shadow's videos, they are looking at any videos with certain tags on them and taking them down before Ollie's people at ACOS are able to file requests, if those videos are deemed by YT to be "personal attacks", which is against their TOS.

3a) Ollie told me that he considers some of the videos to be creative and rather funny. He says that, if he can find one before YT takes it down, he saves it off. Whether or not this is for evidentiary purposes in re a libel/slander/defamation suit, I dunno. Again, apply skepticism as you wish.

4) He also told me how much the BWraep cost ACOS. I won't give any specific figures because I can't prove what he said. If he wasn't lying to me, it was a significant amount. He's going to write it off on his taxes as a business expense.

I had better not see a "tl;dr" at any point after this message. This is important information. Again, take it with however many grains of salt you wish. I'm just the messenger.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

YouTube - DMCA: The rant of You know who (mirror)

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Thanks for the info, Q. And I love how Ollie is telling different things to different people. The more lies you tell, it gets harder to keep track of them all.

In the takedown notice I got from YT, Ollie claimed that the photo was infringing, but his argument was specifically that it was STOLEN from him. We got it from a German Social Networking site, where he had put it himself. His line about it being watermarked etc is bullshit, it is OBVIOUSLY a personal photo, plus a few Anons have mucked around with that photo and not found any watermark.

I don't regret the little CP allegation in my vid and it will stay there. As long as I can sow that seed of doubt in people's minds....anyhoo, he looks like a fucking paedophile, that's for damn sure!

Glad to hear the BWraep hit him fincancially, I participated in that. But I guarantee you it cost him more than he told you.

Yes, there are now a shitload of the videos back up, courtesy of my 10 sockpuppet accounts. Now I am going to bed.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

The ID on that photo isn't a watermark per se. According to Ollie, it's more of a microdot-type identification, probably placed on the original. I won't delve into the rationale behind the whole theft issue; however, I did mention to him that I'm certainly aware of the necessity of building up a paper trail. In effect, the police report was him doing what he considered to be due diligence. I'm not trying to rationalize it, justify it, or make excuses for him. I'm just saying that I understand what his rationale was for doing it.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

I fully endorse this. He is number 2 on my personal list. (we could have an anonymous most wanted list in the future perhaps)

However, in regards to the black ops... DO NOT post exactly how you are going to go about it. Cat is already out about it in this post, but we don't want them telegraphing our moves, only for the sake of directing the idea of black ops should we write about it. The sooner we are able to get that task done the better. (couldn't he get rid of all that stuff)?

Im not going to lie though... black ops is tempting... g

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

@The Shadow

Your best bet is to organise 2 or 3 contacts with maybe a dozen sock accounts each to upload the Schaper vids BUT set them to PRIVATE. That way you will all get them uploaded quietly, then at a prearranged time, everyone makes them public. Bang. You get 30-40 videos all online at virtually the same time.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Is it possible to produce and copyright a mini clip in the U.S.for little moneys before uploading it to the tube?

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

i personally wouldn't mind that all our steoRAIDers peek at Oshiter's stash - but take care not to make it into a website takeover

dont ever give the scilons a reason to call us cyber terrorists again (which means dont get caught )

let the scilons baww evidence-less acusations at us as much they want - but plox no RL shit

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Q, I respect you. I really do.
But regardless of whether or not he finds said videos insulting, it is still ILLEGAL to file false DMCA claims, which he did, in fact, do prior to the Sept. 3rd attacks.

If, and that's a big if, we still feel that he is continuing his bullshit, we at least have him on that.

COMPILE THE EVIDENCE, PEOPLE. DO IT.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Has anybody filed a counter DMCA claim prior to September 3rd? Any law enforcement agency would require us to show documentation. He seems to have shifted tactics too. Our videos no longer get DMCA'd but receive TOS take-down notices.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

YouTube - Bow chika wow wow

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

It's just a matter of time before this video is removed. We just keep wasting energy because we should focus on the mission.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Do you really think that this bastard is stupid and keeps his CP in the open?

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Epic lulz, but only a matter of time before it gets taken down.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

thats not what i'm warning against

i'm simply saying that:

A) i have nothing against a lil "online investigation" o Oshitter's servers

but

B) make sure to leave nothing behind so the scilons cant come crawling all butthurt to the media claiming new evil weaboo hacker on steroid attack

thats all really

I dont expect any CP to found in the first few open directories - never said that - although it could be fun if someone could leak some financial info (find out how much gaygold the scilon orgs get... could be fun to ask them about that)

but TLR - i would just like advice caution so the scilons dont get another news-story to pwn us with in the media (not that they have much to begin with, but my idea is to not give them anything else)

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Good luck.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

This is just a waste of our time because we can't seem to remove him from the web. We need something big to finally take him down for good and I don't care what it is. I WANT BLOOD FOR VIDEOS.

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Links off of 2nd website go to State attorney generals of your state. Please Stop bad porn & masturbation!!!!!!!! Think of the sperm!!!!!!!

http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/pub/IOCprivacy.cfm
http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/pub/IOCprivacy.cfm
http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/pub/IOCprivacy.cfm

http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/pub/IOCprivacy.cfm
http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/pub/IOCprivacy.cfm
http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/pub/IOCprivacy.cfm

Dox on Oliver Schaper

I have been asked by Graham Berry to encourage all anons affected by the actions of Mr. Oliver Schaper to e-mail everthing you can, including hyperlinks, to him at:

grahamberry@ca.rr.com.

Graham feels it is time to drop a lawsuit on Mr. Schaper for his repeated, unlawful acts against Anonymous particularly in terms of YouTube videos being taken down under false pretenses.

Any anon that has been personally involved in the matter involving Mr. Schaper or has evidence that would be pertinent in litigation against Mr. Schaper, please email it to Graham.

Graham is very disturbed of Mr. Schaper's actions and wants to pursue the appropriate legal actions against him. Thank you.

Re: Dox on Oliver Schaper

So what dox do we have on OSAchaper?

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

All I have is that information previously shared around. I'm not sure it's of any value in this particular case though.

Subject Name: Oliver Schaper
Listed Aliases: OLIVER SCHAPER
Listed Dates of Birth:
Listed Ages:


1 12577 WEDGWOOD CIR
TUSTIN, CA 92780 Property Report



ADDRESS & CONTACT INFO:
12577 WEDGWOOD CIR
TUSTIN, CA 92780 Get A Complete Property Report



Get a Complete Property Report
Complete Property Reports Include:

* List of all 33 neighborhood sex offenders
* Sales History
* Mortgage Information
* Satellite Image
* And More

Get a Complete
Property Report

PROPERTY DETAILS
Owner Name Property Info
Rodriguez Rafael A
Sq. ft.: 1,076Bedrooms: 2
Taxes: $4,886 (2006)
NEIGHBORS AROUND THE PROPERTY
Name
Barbara Smith
12565 Wedgwood Cir
Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 669-1182 Background Check
Manoj Roychowdhury
12559 Wedgwood Cir
Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 731-4797 Background Check
P Redmond
12570 Wedgwood Cir
Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 838-7769 Background Check
C Hoffman
12558 Wedgwood Cir
Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 508-6770 Background Check
M H Berry
12553 Wedgwood Cir
Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 838-2171 Background Check
AREA DATA
Total Population Avg. House Price Avg. Household Income Area Sex Offenders
55,047 $233,500 $47,961 33



CRIMINAL CHECK FOR ALL OLIVER SCHAPER IN THE STATE OF CA
RECORD 1 of 4
IDENTIFICATION
Oliver Schaper
SOURCE: California
DOB: 03/04/1975

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: C50191 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: Orange DISPOSITION DATE: 10/24/2005
OFFENSE DATE: 10/24/2005 OFFENSE COUNTY: Orange
RECORD 2 of 4
IDENTIFICATION
Oliver Schaper
SOURCE: California
DOB: 03/04/1975

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: 43098DQ - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: Orange DISPOSITION DATE: 08/19/2007
OFFENSE DATE: 05/26/2007 OFFENSE COUNTY: Orange
RECORD 3 of 4
IDENTIFICATION
Oliver Schaper
SOURCE: California

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: 08CM01122 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: Orange DISTRICT: CENTRAL SUPERIOR
DISPOSITION DATE: 02/08/2008 OFFENSE DATE: 02/08/2008
OFFENSE COUNTY: Orange
RECORD 4 of 4
IDENTIFICATION
Oliver Schaper
SOURCE: California

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T367082 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: Orange DISPOSITION DATE: 03/26/2008
OFFENSE DATE: 03/26/2008 OFFENSE COUNTY: Orange




CIVIL JUDGEMENT RECORDS FOR OLIVER SCHAPER IN THE STATE OF CA


Record 1:
Civil Record Verification: Confirm Case # 0512240 at the Court House
Defendant: SCHAPER, OLIVER Case Number: 0512240
Filing Type: CHAPTER 13 FILED Entity Type: INDIVIDUAL RECORD
Filing Date: 20050407 City: TUSTIN
State: CA Zip: 92781
Schedule 341 Date: 20050525 Assets Available: Y
Court Code: CA010 Court Name: SANTA ANA CENTRAL DISTRICT
Judge Initials: JR Unlawful Detainer: N




Record 2:
Civil Record Verification: Confirm Case # 0414580 at the Court House
Defendant: SCHAPER, OLIVER Case Number: 0414580
Filing Type: CHAPTER 13 DISMISSED Entity Type: INDIVIDUAL RECORD
Filing Date: 20040721 City: TUSTIN
State: CA Zip: 92781
Schedule 341 Date: 20040831 Assets Available: Y
Court Code: CA010 Court Name: SANTA ANA CENTRAL DISTRICT
Judge Initials: JR Unlawful Detainer: N




Record 3:
Civil Record Verification: Confirm Case # 0514255 at the Court House
Defendant: SCHAPER, OLIVER Case Number: 0514255
Filing Type: CHAPTER 13 FILED Entity Type: INDIVIDUAL RECORD
Filing Date: 20050616 City: TUSTIN
State: CA Zip: 92781
Schedule 341 Date: 20050802 Assets Available: Y
Court Code: CA010 Court Name: SANTA ANA CENTRAL DISTRICT
Judge Initials: JR Unlawful Detainer: N




Record 4:
Civil Record Verification: Confirm Case # 0414580 at the Court House
Defendant: SCHAPER, OLIVER Case Number: 0414580
Filing Type: CHAPTER 13 DISMISSED Entity Type: INDIVIDUAL RECORD
Filing Date: 20040721 City: TUSTIN
State: CA Zip: 92781
Schedule 341 Date: 20040831 Assets Available: Y
Court Code: CA010 Court Name: SANTA ANA CENTRAL DISTRICT
Judge Initials: JR Unlawful Detainer: N




Record 5:
Civil Record Verification: Confirm Case # 0512240 at the Court House
Defendant: SCHAPER, OLIVER Case Number: 0512240
Filing Type: CHAPTER 13 DISMISSED Entity Type: INDIVIDUAL RECORD
Filing Date: 20050407 City: TUSTIN
State: CA Zip: 92781
Schedule 341 Date: 20050525 Assets Available: Y
Court Code: CA010 Court Name: SANTA ANA CENTRAL DISTRICT
Judge Initials: JR Unlawful Detainer: N




Record 6:
Civil Record Verification: Confirm Case # 0514255 at the Court House
Defendant: SCHAPER, OLIVER Case Number: 0514255
Filing Type: CHAPTER 13 DISMISSED Entity Type: INDIVIDUAL RECORD
Filing Date: 20050616 City: TUSTIN
State: CA Zip: 92781
Schedule 341 Date: 20050802 Assets Available: Y
Court Code: CA010 Court Name: SANTA ANA CENTRAL DISTRICT
Judge Initials: JR Unlawful Detainer: N




Name Address History Previous Cities Avg. Income / Home Value
1
Oliver Schaper
DOB: 03/15/1975
AGE: 33 Years Old
Address 1:
2424 TUSTIN #P8
SANTA ANA, CA 92705
(714) 836-6444

Address 2:
2070 SAINT JOSEPH
BATAVIA, OH 45103

Santa Ana, CA
Batavia, OH
Avg. Income:
$62,368

Avg. Home Value:
$376,500
Property Report
2
Oliver Schaper
DOB: 03/15/1975
AGE: 33 Years Old
Address 1:
PO BOX 948
TUSTIN, CA 92781

Tustin, CA
Avg. Income:
$50,986

Avg. Home Value:
$250,300
Property Report
3
Oliver Schaper
RELATIVES:
Ivon Schaper
Address 1:
12577 WEDGWOOD CIR
TUSTIN, CA 92780

Tustin, CA
Avg. Income:
$47,961

Avg. Home Value:
$256,900
Property Report
4
Oliver Schaper
DOB: 03/15/1975
AGE: 33 Years Old
Address 1:
PO BOX 11742
SANTA ANA, CA 92711

Santa Ana, CA
Avg. Income:
$50,986

Avg. Home Value:
$250,300
Property Report




CRIMINAL CHECK FOR ALL OLIVER SCHAPER IN THE UNITED STATES
RECORD 1 of 4
IDENTIFICATION
Oliver Schaper
SOURCE: California
DOB: 03/04/1975

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: C50191 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: Orange DISPOSITION DATE: 10/24/2005
OFFENSE DATE: 10/24/2005 OFFENSE COUNTY: Orange
RECORD 2 of 4
IDENTIFICATION
Oliver Schaper
SOURCE: California
DOB: 03/04/1975

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: 43098DQ - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: Orange DISPOSITION DATE: 08/19/2007
OFFENSE DATE: 05/26/2007 OFFENSE COUNTY: Orange
RECORD 3 of 4
IDENTIFICATION
Oliver Schaper
SOURCE: California

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: 08CM01122 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: Orange DISTRICT: CENTRAL SUPERIOR
DISPOSITION DATE: 02/08/2008 OFFENSE DATE: 02/08/2008
OFFENSE COUNTY: Orange
RECORD 4 of 4
IDENTIFICATION
Oliver Schaper
SOURCE: California

OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T367082 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: Orange DISPOSITION DATE: 03/26/2008
OFFENSE DATE: 03/26/2008 OFFENSE COUNTY: Orange



Record 1 of 4
Profile Info
Oliver Schaper

ADDRESS:
11742 BOX
SANTA ANA, CA 92711
Domain Names

MELON.COM

MELONFURNITURE.COM
Record 2 of 4
Profile Info
Oliver Schaper

ADDRESS:
948 BOX
TUSTIN, CA 92781

PHONE: (714) 418-4610
Domain Names

THESCHAPERCOMPANY.COM

TSCDANCE.COM
Record 3 of 4
Profile Info
OLIVER SCHAPER
Employment History

*
MELON TELECOM
Position:
Owner
Contact Info:
BOX 11742
SANTA ANA, CA 92711

Record 4 of 4
Profile Info
OLIVER SCHAPER
Domain Names

Gensler
Employment History

*
GENSLER
Contact Info:
2 HARRISON ST SUITE 400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415-433-3700

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Outdated information. We need to real dox on that fuck. Do we suck cock or why can't we get real data on this bastard?

He pisses on our playground on a daily bases and all we can present are old dox? How lame are we?

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

..maybe this will be usefull for someone.
As I heard our pal has baaawed around cause some use his photo, I though a free to use artwork would help a bit. ;-)

oshaper vektor pack


..although I find naming for Anons not neccessary.

Pack includes Illustrator File, EPS, PDF and a big JPG.
RapidShare: Easy Filehosting

Re: Dox on Oliver Schaper

Prior to the September 3 attacks, the only "docs" I have is when he claimed copyright over 2 videos that clearly didn't belong to him (CTV news April 12th coverage and CBC news February 10th coverage). He did the same with youtube users mollie2810 and TheEvilOfScientology, and possibly others, using Media House Enterprises, his own company. He was clearly committing perjury doing this, and then all of a sudden, American Rights Counsel LLC comes along and claims copyright to one of my own videos, which suspends me. I'm not sure how this comes into play anymore now that my videos have been restored.

As per HouseSpideranon's stickied message, the EFF is already investigating, so is Graham Berry asking affected anons the same thing Eva Galperin (of the EFF) is asking? To e-mail all pertinent information regarding Oliver Schaper?

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

He has struck already, its gone from rapidshit.

although this was handmade vector art and licenced well you still have the jpeg though.
I will PM Ladynonymous to upload it again eg. on our social network.

so If anyone has downloaded it already repost and mirror pl0x

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

JewTube just removed a bunch of his videos. All for TOS violations, no DMCA. Can we still fuck him for his crimes?

Re: That's it. Ollie has gone too far; Time for Salvo Two.

Well reading this thread why not ask our beloved attorney for help to get our work copyright protected

and then sue ollie´s ass for removing the shit