SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

FIFY:


Sounds a LOT like Larry:

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Download - Linux Mint

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

So that's 6 years after Hubbard was convicted of Snow White, and when the ever goody-goody church told the FBI that they had no contact whatsoever with Hubbard?

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

.
Hello all you lurking Scientologists!
Larry blew. You can too!
Here's how:

Remember:

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfSROf6Js-Y"]YouTube- The Truth Will Vanquish Scientology and David Miscavige[/nomedia]

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

So it took this guy how long to figure out he was part of a criminal organization?

Wow some people are slow.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Lol cazy vs. crazy grudge match. Awesome.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Thanks for paying attention and doing the math.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

If it hasn't been said: Larry, welcome back to the land of the living.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Aoki couldn't have said it better himself...



...and that's saying a lot.

rofl

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Wait, is that newly revealed footage of Tamphex and that Hannah guy?

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Hubbard wasn't convicted of Snow White, his wife was.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

I don't know what the fuck that means, Herro.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

That's an amazing "refund of donations" policy. Utterly disingenuous. Sometimes I wish George Orwell were still alive. He would have shredded that language in such an amusing way.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

18 people were convicted of Snow White. (11 in US, 7 in Canada.)

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Recently a protester in Sydney brutally sexually assaulted an innocent Scientologist. People here don't like to talk about it.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Yeah you like that kind of thing don't you lover

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

that's just wrong.



[COLOR="White"].[/COLOR]

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Please don't say disingenuous

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

May I ask why? Genuinely puzzled.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

This Anon ^^^^^ gets it right.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

One thing that struck me, transcribing several sections of it, is how often Feshbach jumps in with a thought, as if to prompt Tommy, who then picks it up and runs with it, as if he's used to counting on her for ideas and parroting her.

I'd bet good money she thinks he's an idiot.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

He always wears serious lifts, like Tom Cruise does. I don't think Davey is over 5 feet barefoot.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Has there been any other sites or publications who have picked up the SP Times + Larry Anderson story? The story plus the audio makes it so damn tasty!

Are you guise emailing sites and publications with links to the SP Times story & the audio clips?

C'mon now . . . you can do it . . .

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

He's 4 ft 11 and 3/4.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

There's something quite disingenuous about the use of that word?

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

i beilieve its disengenderous per td

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

!

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Sometimes, she jumps in to interrupt Larry while he's answering a previous question.

That's a standard bullbaiting technique to knock the other person off balance, break their chain of thought and annoy the piss out of them. In the full form, they keep asking the same question over and over, interrupting any possible response to the question. (Heber: "Are you on drugs? I think you're on drugs....")

Most people grow out of stuff like that after the 3rd grade.

She probably does think that Tommy is an idiot. Well, a stopped clock is right twice a day and all that...

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

The irony of all that is just hilarious.

HCO Policy Letter
21 November 1968 Issue 1

SENIOR POLICY


We always deliver what we promise.

L. RON HUBBARD Founder

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Any idiot lawyer wet behind the ears and fresh out of law school can see the scientology "donations" racket as a "fee for service". No one gets it wrong, except the culties. They insist it is a donation, but regardless of "labels" scientology insists upon, the reality is that it is a contract / fee for service.

You give the fee. You get a service. Each fee paid is targetted directly to a specific service. An invoice/receipt is drafted by C of S and printed and signed and given back to the payer which indicates the amount paid and for what service the two parties are contracting. The payor is contracting to take a course (for example) and the payee (C of S) is contracting to give the course.

The rub happens when C of S refuses to let the person take the service for which he has already paid. Example (and this one happens a lot) Joe Blow pays tens of thousands for auditing at Flag in Clearwater Florida. The Flag MAA (the sea org ethics officer) decides that the person is not eligible (at this time) to go to Flag and must _____________________ (fill in blank with loooooong list of steps the person must do and comply with before he "becomes eligible" to "be on Flag"). The person can never seen to get through the steps for whatever reason, or (more usually) the Flag MAA continues to pile on steps that now must be done in a never-ending series of ethics actions (hoops to jump through).

The poor scio-member eventually gets pissed off and decides to quit scientology and ask for the tens of thousands of money back.

Scientology can cry and whine and call it a donation all they want, but despite the misapplied label (donation) it is a fee for service and the server (C of S) is refusing to provide the service.

Same goes for someone who pre-pays for an OT level and by the time they ask for their money back they either haven't reached the level, or (more usually) C of S has "made the runway longer" (to quote an L. Ron Hubbard phrase which scios love to quote).

What I'm saying here is that though the Church of Scientology may well have come to some agreement with the IRS that these thingies are called "donations" and that "parishioners" can deduct the fees from their income when doing their tax returns, if push comes to shove and some "parishioner" takes the Church of Scientology to court for return of fees to services not taken... especially considering that Hubbard wrote plenty of polices about return of prepayments not used... it wouldn't take two minutes for the judge or jury to figure out that these are not "donations" and that they are "fees for service" and must be paid back if the payee refuses to (or cannot or does not) service the payer.

Got it?

Supporting evidence would include the annual statements the Church of Scientology sends to its members showing them what they still have on account. Each amount is tagged specifically to some "future" service. The accounts don't just say "you have $20,000 on account". No, they say "you have $12,000 on account for Grades auditing, and $3,000 for the PTS/SP Course, and $5,000 for the Class I course." That's what the statements say.

Can any idiot read that and think that the money on account is a donation?

Nope.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Yep! I definitely noticed that.

Jessica "acks" Larry off his point quite a few times during the session - usually successfully. She cuts him off on the "four versions of this book" conversation with the sudden "Have you ever gotten anyone off drugs?" bit near the end, for example.

Jessica seems quite a bit cleverer than Tommy to me, for what that's worth. She's still a shrill, predictable Ronbot, but she appears to think faster than he does. She just talks less, because Tommy is senior and has all that aggression always waiting to boil over.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

I'll bet they didn't even pay Jason or Larry for their acting... or paid them "in kind"... like giving them some auditing on account or courses on account.

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

I guess that's her job with all the robots.

Tom Cruise - Salon.com

Re: SP Times Larry Anderson wants his $ back (with luscious audio)

Would you prefer the original?