Re: Ron Savelo DMCA Do you think I care about if you like me or not? I DON'T SO FUCK OFF. When will you get the fact that anonymous is not a beauty or popularity contest? The EFF looked at Ollie and nothing happened because all the evidence was gone like fucking magic and they have enough against Ron, a habitual offender. Ppeople like him should be priority for the EFF but again, they do not care. Proof me wrong or GTFO. All anons have done is to baaaaw the EFF with no result. The cult is still doing business as usual on jewtube, removing videos. P.S. next time you like to suck my cock, send me a PM!
Re: Ron Savelo DMCA THIS IS THE MOST RETARDED POST I THINK I HAVE EVER SEEN ON WWP. Go fucking look up what the EFF has done and then go kiss their ass.
Re: Ron Savelo DMCA So what has the EFF done to stop the removal of videos on JewTube? NOTHING! Videos still being removed and the EFF has done shit. Sorry but unless you can show me were the EFF has taken on JewTube and won the case and Jewtube restored all video GTFO. Btw. Love the violent niggerfag!
Re: Ron Savelo DMCA It's WAY past your bedtime, 0815, now sodd off! EFF has done more than any of you will ever dream of in therms of protecting our internets, and they ofc realize that a true warrior picks his battles, instead of letting the battles pick him.
Re: Ron Savelo DMCA They went after Diebold for fraudulent DMCA claims, too, and Diebold is not only wealthy but as nasty as Scientology in many ways. This is not a great test case for many reasons. Many of the people involved have failed to counter notify, and while many anons have a good reason for doing so, it doesn't make the case easy to litigate. The evidence is probably also a mess. There's also another issue. When the DMCA notifications fail, they switch to other methods like "TOS violations." If YouTube wants to cancel people's accounts and/or remove their videos for "TOS" instead of DMCA, there's little a court can do about it. In both the Diebold case and the Michael Crook case, the perp was interfering with services the victims had a right to receive and were paying for, the case was fairly small (limited to one basic set of data like the Diebold memos or some pictures Crook clearly did not own), and the point would be clear. Here, the potential case is a mess without a dream plaintiff, preferably a paying customer or someone who earns money through YouTube, and the downside is high, if you somehow drag Scientology into the case and have to blow millions or beat a strategic retreat. The chance of the latter is pretty low, but is part of why it is tough to get legal counsel in cases involving Scientology. The bean-counters at any firm take a look at the risk, the potential profit, and decide not to bother. EFF, just like a for-profit company, only has limited resources. In this massive recession, I bet donations are down, too.
Re: Ron Savelo DMCA I don't care what they have done for the interwebs, I care about their actions against scilons. I picked my battle.
Re: Ron Savelo DMCA BAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW I CAN'T GET THE EFF TO BE MY PA! Here's a question. Have you actually even contacted them? If I remember correctly it was HouseSpiderV2 that was in contact them. http://forums.whyweprotest.net/186-...igating-oschaper-arc-llc-they-need-you-28622/ The EFF has been fighting the DMCA since before it was a law and they have been fighting for everyone's freedom of speech since before there was a World Wide Web. P.S. Your personal vendettas mean squat to them.
Re: Ron Savelo DMCA I have to agree, EFF is NYPA. Just put up some Ron Savelo videos, and when he DMCA's them, get a namefag to counter-claim. Keep the dox, let it accumulate, and THEN go to the EFF.
Re: Ron Savelo DMCA I know the EFF is not NMPA but this has been going on for over a year and it would be nice to see finally results.
