Hi everyone! I am sure everyone here knows ABLE owns the Narconon franchise. Also ABLE is legally a separate corporation from the COS. However ABLE was included in the 1993 closing agreement with the IRS. Can this proven physical link be used in court to bring COS as a co defendant? Would this be enough evidence to show the courts that COS owns Narconon? We all know its the same program but Narconon separates by saying "Works of LRH" and not the religion of Scientology. Can prosecutors use the closing agreement in 1993 to show otherwise? Every case I have looked up, Narconon has settled out of court for undisclosed amounts. Granted I have only been looking into the cases for a few days. I can't find any cases where the 1993 agreement has been used to directly link COS to Narconon but I could be missing it?