So you saw a group whose opinions you didn't agree with, and decided to attack that group. How is this any different from what you accuse us? Also, did you bother to look at any of the facts we have presented so far? Apparently not. Well, at this point you are becoming tiresome and repetative. You are nothing but a small dog yapping at the heels of a fire truck racing to the rescue scene. We are the firemen. Best to ignore the small dog yapping and concentrate on putting out the fire.
I think it's a shame so many Anons in this thread are attacking the person posting the argument, rather than the argument itself. We have the dox to demonstrate what a dodgy organisation Narconon is - why not share them with the less well-informed? (Whether Scientologist or not). I think we can cope with polite scepticism, which is all that I'm seeing here.
Or is this a lame attempt at turning anons against each other....yes I think that is exactly what it is Fail.
Nearly everyone in this thread is OSA pretending to be Anonymous, because even Scientologists need to practice their troll-fu from time to time.
Because crappy arguing on the Internet is a good distraction from the fact that Narconon, not Anonymous, bears the burden of proof. Narconon has to prove that humans sweat out toxins because they are the ones making that claim. So where is your evidence, Narconon?
Oh, and while you're at it, SHOW ME JUST ONE MOTHERFUCKING CLEAR (that obeys Hubbard's definition). OJ Simpson doesn't count LOL
I wish Anonymous would listen to me. Where is group think when you need it? Do not throw five or six weaker arguments at your opponent when you have one kick-ass argument. When you do that you let the other guy off the hook, which is fail. This is the best argument: 1. Narconon makes claims without evidence. For example, that people can sweat out toxins. 2. Where is your evidence, Narconon?
You should know there are no consensi here. Also: Welcome to the Dome. It pleases me to toy with it. Sure, but fucknut wouldn't answer, as it plays HQS games with us.
It's amusing that this troll seems unaware that mods can identify anonymous posters within their purview. I know who you are. Your posts are as hollow as your cranium. (you can look that up in your dictionary)
Culture? LOL, no you're not. You're just an off-topic troll trying to derail and distract. Spend less time worrying about who WE are and look at what you're doing. Waste of life and carbon and breathing gas, sniping fora critical of Scientology and NarCONon and DAVID MISCAVIGE. Also, lern 2 spell, ya Delphi grad!
When there is evidence and a string of deaths related to a certain drug rehab, these are facts. Relying on the facts is not "group think." Killing people with stupid junk medical theories and neglect is not "help." Agreeing that a fraudulent rehab with Scientology ties is dangerous and should be shut down is not 'group think,' it's common human decency. Something you have perverted into a Bad Thing, while supporting this fraudulent, dangerous scam. Says a lot about you, nothing good.
