I don't know if it means anything, but, previously, a google search on PIERRE ETHIER brought up this thread on the first page. As of this morning, no more.
Lol, they hired Keith ROFLMAO *wiping tears from the eyes* ah, sry, just kidding So, yeah, this thread is listed on page 3 now...and even more interesting google's own image link is on page 2, never seen that before. There is a SEO at work, I'd say.
Some of it: https://groups.google.com/groups/pr...AD5bE0eSTtWCIiQWZkOLhlaWMj6vob75xS36mXc24h6ww (Part of the time, she was stealing Fuzzy's user name Voltaire's Child, but the email is different.)
Since you're so interested in being politically correct, you should know that "retard" is highly offensive.
From her Usenet posts, I have my doubts that she could function as a checkout clerk. A Profession Engineer "responsible for managing the Quality Management Program and the Six Sigma Lean Projects at a Fortune 500 company, where she received the Key Contributor Award for performance excellence" seems unbelievable unless the entire company was staffed by wingnuts and moonbats. I suspect that this is a different Catherine Ethier.
Hey fatty mcafatterson take your passive aggressive fatty angst and skip a meal. It will make you less grouchy.
I'm vegan sir. Being fat is impossible. You tho should take your own advice. Burger King isn't going to go out of business if you don't go once.
I like the browns ones in my chili and the round orange ones to make soup with like the kurdish people do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lentil
I am a meat-eater but my kurdish friend can make yummy food with no meat, egs or milk in it. he is very lean.
A gutmensch. Excuse me while I go puke. Oh, and haven't you got anything else to do? Join an Attac-meeting? Protesting at the local slaughterhouse? Freeing furfags?
In Scientology, being fat is sometimes considered a sign for an "upstat" ( = having good statistics) person - in combination with a) being rich (if the individual is a public Scientologist) or b) being a good producer (if the individual is a Scn staff member. He is then being referred to as "having a good 'havingness'", i. e. "Pierre Ethier has a 'good havingness'" because he is fat. Or in non-scientologese: Pierre Ethier is considered a well-doing scientologist because he is able to accumulate fat around his body. I hope that is somewhat comprehensible. This is how Scientologists dealing with fat people.
He's fucking out-ethics (out-ethier?) on his 1D. Surely you must be able to see that. No clam but an MAA would have the nerve to tell him, though.
No, amassing fat is not considered "out-ethics" in Scientology. Look at Hubbard from 1966 on. He was fat too and he was the most "in-ethics" "thetan" "in this sector of the galaxy"! As I stated before, within the belief system of Scientology - under certain conditions - huge amount of bodyfat are a sign of a "good havingness" of that individual Scientologist.
Tutty mentioned ESMB's ToS. I mentioned one instance of Emma violating Emma's ToS. Nothing more. Nothing less.
as long as she is the one that can pull the plug of the webside she can do all that she wants. argueing tos with the person that can rename every poster to spaceducky is rather stupid, isn't it?
