OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

AngryGayPope1 · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

DaveAnonymous;1064706 said:

How so? Are they trying to troll somebody into saying something inappropriate?

They think they can get information from black ops.

TehHerro · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

DaveAnonymous;1064681 said:

Anybody check out their $5,000 reward?

$5,000 Reward | Religious Freedom Watch

isn't this somewhat illegal?

Bob Loblaw · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Has anyone who's visited the RFW forums (proxycondom, etc.) found that they're being portscanned?

AngryGayPope1 · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

omg not portscanned

054 has ur port 80

DaveAnonymous · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

TehHerro;1064735 said:

isn't this somewhat illegal?

What part? Claiming threats were made from the IP addresses they list?

King Nerd · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Bob Loblaw;1064736 said:

Has anyone who's visited the RFW forums (proxycondom, etc.) found that they're being portscanned?

I haven't bothered clicking on links to the honeypot... yet.

DaveAnonymous;1064749 said:

What part? Claiming threats were made from the IP addresses they list?

What kind of fucking idiot would go to that site without a proxy?

TehHerro · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

DaveAnonymous;1064749 said:

What part? Claiming threats were made from the IP addresses they list?

offering the reward bit

DeathHamster · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Bob Loblaw;1064736 said:

Has anyone who's visited the RFW forums (proxycondom, etc.) found that they're being portscanned?

Like I bother to check what's happening on the other side of the border router?

Still... If they want to play, I'm up for it. The forum.religiousfreedomwatch.org server is outside the Prolexic shield, and I haven't played games with port scanners in ages. (I wrote a program that would watch the firewall logs in real time with a different sound effect for each commonly scanned port. Goober With Firewall Extreme!)

Smurf · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

DaveAnonymous;1064681 said:

Anybody check out their $5,000 reward?

$5,000 Reward | Religious Freedom Watch

Joel Philiips has offered this "reward" from the first day he started this OSA scam site. No one has collected on it. Joel has the integrity of a cow turd.

DeathHamster · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Smurf;1064770 said:

Joel Philiips has offered this "reward" from the first day he started this OSA scam site. No one has collected on it. Joel has the integrity of a cow turd.

No he didn't. It was added about a year pre-Anonymous. (The rest is correct.)

Smurf · Nov 13, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Very interesting comment posted on ARS:

Frank Berriz, enraged by the possibility of a lawsuit against Joel Phillips that could consume American Coast title, is trying to eject Phillips.

Berriz is supported by Linda Blood, the third owner. Employees have also had it with being associated with the hate site.

Breaking News: Trouble at American Coast Title - alt.religion.scientology | Google Groups

Realty Reelz | Frank Berriz, American Coast Title Co.

Update: Joel Philips has posted this "Harassment Notice" in response to comments from Chuck Beatty.

Recently, unknown individuals have posted information on the internet stating that American Coast Title, Linda Blood, and Frank Berriz are affiliated with this website. These statements are false. They are not affiliated in any way with RFW. They do not pay for any portion of this website nor do they share the views expressed on this site.

Additionally, while the hateful postings say that Joel Phillips (the author of this site) wrote them, he did not. The information contained in the postings is false, and the postings do not reflect Mr. Phillips' views.

http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/

AngryGayPope1 · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonydon;1064496 said:

They really think and believe this bullshit, thats the saddest part. The other part that bothers me is that they call us terrorists and I can tell you of 4 $cilons here is Clearwater that I know that are armed to the fukkin teeth. In fact one of them is in the country illegally using all fake dox with more weaponry than the normal enthusiast would consider appropriate.

Stop sitting on your fucking hands and report the criminal you shitbrained faggot

JohnnyRUClear · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

silentbob151a;1064268 said:

seriously this is a fail to come

Fear not. We'll come when it's time.

Smurf;1064770 said:

Joel Philiips has offered this "reward" from the first day he started this OSA scam site. No one has collected on it. Joel has the integrity of a cow turd.

What do you mean, [strike]an African or a European[/strike] a wet or a dry cow turd? Cuz the dry ones actually hold together pretty well -- at least, compared to how they start out.

anonky · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Has anyone read the lawlworthy excerpt about Anonymous on the original page? I almost peed from laughter

iaxiloll · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Did anyone see this ?

Anonymous | Religious Freedom Watch

BEHIND THE FAÇADE OF THE “ANONYMOUS” HATE GROUP

Introduction

A grandmother in Texas, visited by her two biracial grandchildren, is plagued by abusive phone calls, online harassment and a racist flyer posted in her neighborhood.

A 14-year old boy in Pasadena, California, who created a “no-cussing” club is deluged with hate e-mails and death threats—nearly 50,000 per day.

A hip-hop website is hacked and defaced with Nazi symbols, fake headlines and pictures saturated with racial slurs.

The common denominator in these incidents? “Script kiddies”1 and cyber bullies calling themselves “Anonymous,” who get their kicks from ruining other people’s lives.

For the past few years, Anonymous has mounted hate campaigns against selected targets, ranging from massive attacks that render websites inaccessible to spreading obscenities and degraded imagery on the Net.

Anonymous members have infested the Internet with postings encouraging suicide and murder. They also have engaged in cyberterrorism and more conventional forms of harassment such as telephone bomb threats and vandalism.

According to a YouTube posting from an Anonymous member, they are “people devoid of any type of soul or conscience,” who live in a place “where taboos do not exist” and have formed “a nameless, faceless, unforgiving mafia.”

The hatred and violence generated by Anonymous is not limited to the virtual world. Pekka-Eric Auvinen posted a threat on an Anonymous forum before going on a shooting rampage, stating he was going to “kill people … in the name of anonymous.” He murdered nine people before taking his own life. Jarrad Willis, after posting a threat on an Anonymous forum to carry out a shopping mall massacre, committed suicide the day before he was to appear in court on related charges.

Certain high-profile members of Anonymous have come forward with details of the group’s behind-the-scenes criminal activities. Included in this publication are a few excerpts from the story that unfolded.

Their motto could be summed up in these words, taken from a video posted by an Anonymous member on YouTube in response to a Fox News exposé in July 2007:

How Did Anonymous Begin?
Guy Fawkes mask
Guy Fawkes mask

Anonymous was born on an online image board called 4chan.org, created in 2004. Anonymous congregated on a an online forum known as “/b/”2, where nothing is off-limits, including mutilated bodies and bestiality.

Later, some Anonymous members moved from 4chan to 7chan because 4chan had “deprived us of our jailbait,” (referring to child pornography). While 7chan no longer exists, Anonymous has created several other “chan” image boards where they post porn, denigrating and obscene comments and racial slurs.

In December 2004, Encyclopedia Dramatica3 was created, and Anonymous material began appearing there. According to Wired Magazine, Encyclopedia Dramatica is a “wikified lexicon of all things /b/.”4

“The Sekrit Code of Anonymous” was published on Encyclopedia Dramatica, stating: “Anonymous is devoid of humanity, morality, pity, and mercy.”

When Anonymous members engage in their so-called real-life “raids,” they hide behind masks, such as the image of 17th century anarchist Guy Fawkes, to conceal their identities while infringing upon the rights of others.

Anonymous claims to have no leaders, but there is clearly a hierarchy within the group. Why do Anonymous members hide behind anonymity and pretend to have no leaders? It is a convenient facade for perverse and sometimes criminal activity on the Internet.

One prominent member and organizer is Gregg Housh, who was convicted in 2005 for conspiracy to violate copyright laws–for his part in a software piracy operation. In October 2008 he was ordered by a court in Boston to stay away from the Church of Scientology, after admitting to disturbing religious services. He was warned that he could face incarceration if he further violated his probation.

At least two Anonymous members have been convicted for making terrorist threats. Other criminal cases are pending.

Stated goal of Anonymous

The following words are taken from online postings by Anonymous members. While some members may claim other goals and intentions, or claim these are merely a “joke,” they cannot divorce themselves from the hate that Anonymous threatens and promotes.

“We will stop at nothing until we’ve achieved our goal. Permanent destruction of the identification role.”

“Anything standing in our way, doesn’t deserve to live. We are void of human restraints, taught to never forgive. Answering the question of who we are is a must. We are Anonymous, indeed. Therefore, Expect us.”

Anonymous doctrine

In a “Message to New Anon from Old Anon,” Anonymous members state:

“Some maladjusted Asian shoots up his university, we laugh. Fifty-thousand die in North Korea, we laugh. AIDS ravages a continent, we laugh.”

“We are human nature unencumbered by pointless ethics, foolish moralities or arbitrary laws and restrictions.”

“We have no culture, we have no laws, written or otherwise. We are an autonomous collective, each an insignificant part of a whole. … We do not feel remorse. We will tear you apart from outside and in, we have all the time in the world.”

The “Anonymous Manifesto of Philosophic Condition” states:

“Right or wrong? No. We destroy for destruction’s sake.”

“Welcome to nihilism made manifest in Western Civilization.”

“Strong were the Nazis, who worshiped might and power to destroy.”

“Strong nihilism has emerged in resentment of a superfluous society.”

“Anonymous has achieved a persona. Anthropologists would call it a ‘death cult.’ We have subjugated our individuality for our thirst for hatred. … We have shattered lives.”

In short, Anonymous is poisoning the Internet with their subversive writings.

Racism & Religious Hatred

Anonymous has targeted Blacks, Jews and Muslims with their hate propaganda. They have denigrated people of all faiths for their religious beliefs with a barrage of demeaning images and obscenities.

In one instance, Anonymous launched an online attack on two popular hip-hop websites, defacing them with swastikas and racial slurs against blacks. The hackers also stole personal information on employees of one of the sites.

Racist, anti-Semitic and other anti-religious images and postings abound on Anonymous sites. Some examples are included herein; others were so offensive they were left out.

Calls for Violent Action, Murder & Suicide

Anonymous members have directed debased and perverse postings to young people, often emotionally vulnerable, goading them to take their own lives. They have posted photographs and instructions online encouraging suicide —and murder.

They have exploited the grief of a family who lost a loved one. The parents of a 7th-grader who shot himself with a rifle were bombarded with prank calls for over a year concerning his death. Anonymous joked about his death, hacked into his MySpace page and turned his face into a zombie.

Anonymous insiders have admitted to vandalism, bomb threats, plans to create and use pipe bombs and Molotov cocktails against the Church of Scientology, and other illegal tactics of their hate campaign.

Even a brief visit to their online forums and websites reveals that Anonymous is in fact a “death cult” as stated in the Anonymous Manifesto.

Who can say how many deaths may have resulted from Anonymous postings?

Cyber-Terrorism & Terrorist Threats

Fox News aired a special report exposing Anonymous in July 2007, after Anonymous hacked a MySpace account and plastered it with images of gay pornography.

In response, Anonymous assaulted Fox News computers with massive attacks from multiple computers, designed to overload Fox’s computers and make them inaccessible–known as a Distributed Denial of Service, or “DDoS” attack.

In early 2008, Anonymous launched 141 million malicious hits against Church of Scientology websites, in an attempt to bring down those sites. During the same period, there were 41 death threats, 56 bomb and arson threats, 103 other threats of violence and 40 incidents of vandalism against the Church. One Anonymous member now faces criminal charges for those DDoS attacks.

The information in this booklet is presented with the purpose of informing the public and law enforcement of this public menace.

Published with permission from Freedom magazine.

1 Script kiddie: a derogatory term used to describe those who use malicious scripts and programs developed by others to attack computer systems and networks.
2 /b/ is a “random” category on 4chan.org, meaning that users can use this forum to post any kinds of images. It can also refer to a state of mind typified by /b/.
3 Encyclopedia Dramatica is a collection of obscenities, racist images and anti-Semitic, irreverent postings, sometimes referred to as “spoof” pf Wikipedia.
4 “Mutilated Furries, Flying Phalluses: Put the Blame of Griefers, the Sociopaths of the Virtual World,” Julian Dibbell, Wired Issue 16.02, Jan 18, 2008
Read Onto: Anonymous: RACISM & RELIGIOUS HATRED

anonky · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

That's the article I was talking about, hilarity

iaxiloll · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

anonky;1064812 said:

Has anyone read the lawlworthy excerpt about Anonymous on the original page? I almost peed from laughter

Lol, I really suck cocks, I went through 15 pages looking to see if this had already been posted only to post it 10 mins after you did.

Sponge · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Smurf;1064779 said:

Very interesting comment posted on ARS:

Frank Berriz, enraged by the possibility of a lawsuit against Joel Phillips that could consume American Coast title, is trying to eject Phillips.

Berriz is supported by Linda Blood, the third owner. Employees have also had it with being associated with the hate site.

Breaking News: Trouble at American Coast Title - alt.religion.scientology | Google Groups

Realty Reelz | Frank Berriz, American Coast Title Co.

Update: Joel Philips has posted this "Harassment Notice" in response to comments from Chuck Beatty.

Recently, unknown individuals have posted information on the internet stating that American Coast Title, Linda Blood, and Frank Berriz are affiliated with this website. These statements are false. They are not affiliated in any way with RFW. They do not pay for any portion of this website nor do they share the views expressed on this site.

Additionally, while the hateful postings say that Joel Phillips (the author of this site) wrote them, he did not. The information contained in the postings is false, and the postings do not reflect Mr. Phillips' views.

Religious Freedom Watch Defending Religious Rights

Interesting. They are reacting. That's one button found.

DeathHamster · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Sponge;1064875 said:

Interesting. They are reacting. That's one button found.

A definite button, but an old one. I believe that's from the campaign that someone did against Joel and RFW a year or so before Anonymous got involved (connected to the claimed $5000 reward), before July 2007.

Meh. Wayback is down for the weekend.

War Breaks Out Between Hackers and Scientology -- There Can Be Only One January 23, 2008, Ryan Singel, Threat Level, Wired

LE · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I still find it amusing how whenever they try to backlash against "Anonymous", they end up rehashing material everyone already knows about 4chan - partially because we already put it out there ourselves via channels like Encyclopedia Dramatica.

You cant "expose" someone who's already busy boasting about their own misadventures.

Smurf · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

DeathHamster;1065000 said:

A definite button, but an old one. I believe that's from the campaign that someone did against Joel and RFW a year or so before Anonymous got involved (connected to the claimed $5000 reward), before July 2007.

What's interesting is that Joel Philips posts a bunch of IP numbers which he claims are threats made against him:

"Religious Freedom Watch offers a $5,000 reward for information leading to the identification and criminal or civil prosecution of persons making threats against RFW and/or persons associated with it. The threats have come from a person or persons using the monikers of ElBaldo, Eggshell White, Advocate of Painful Death or similar names.

The following are some of the IP numbers identified in either the usenet postings or email threats that have been received by the publisher:"

$5,000 Reward | Religious Freedom Watch

A check of these IP numbers shows many of them coming from Russia, Ukraine and Arab countries.

Whois.net - Domain Names

DaveAnonymous · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

And if they really had evidence of threats, then I imagine the police would look into it. Typical for Scions to cry poor me.

Hubbard-Telescope · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061110 said:

RFW is namefagging some DC anons on RFW forum (names are xxxed out here)

Washington DC - Religious Freedom Watch Forums

Oh hai. Well, I just found out about this today, lol. Wow, Scientology thinks I'm a whole lot more bad ass and skilled with internetz than I am. :/ I'm not sure whether to be flattered? If only they knew the true extent of how really boring I am.

I'm not too concerned about me, but a lot of the people they are targeting are minors and as cyber stalking children is kind of a big deal, we're going to be contacting the FBI cyber crimes unit to make a report as we're erring on the side of caution to protect the safety of the minors who protest with us.

JohnnyRUClear · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Hubbard-Telescope;1065375 said:

Oh hai. Well, I just found out about this today, lol. Wow, Scientology thinks I'm a whole lot more bad ass and skilled with internetz than I am. :/ I'm not sure whether to be flattered? If only they knew the true extent of how really boring I am.

I'm not too concerned about me, but a lot of the people they are targeting are minors and as cyber stalking children is kind of a big deal, we're going to be contacting the FBI cyber crimes unit to make a report as we're erring on the side of caution to protect the safety of the minors who protest with us.

They're hardly "minors" as you say. Just suppressive thetans in recently-acquired meat bodies. Probably psychs, I'll bet.

bastet · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Raging evil, suppressive forces went bizzurkk today at ideal Org. check your local youtube listings.

Herro · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Hubbard-Telescope;1065375 said:

Oh hai. Well, I just found out about this today, lol. Wow, Scientology thinks I'm a whole lot more bad ass and skilled with internetz than I am. :/ I'm not sure whether to be flattered? If only they knew the true extent of how really boring I am.

I'm not too concerned about me, but a lot of the people they are targeting are minors and as cyber stalking children is kind of a big deal, we're going to be contacting the FBI cyber crimes unit to make a report as we're erring on the side of caution to protect the safety of the minors who protest with us.

ZOMG CYBER TERORISTS!

LE · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I smell libel suits.

Anonynamefag · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Hey, OSAfags, I know you're reading this, so I want you to answer this question on those forums.

If RFW defends the rights of all religions, why is that Scientologists, who make up most of if not all of RFW staff, believe that every other religion comes from an alien implant?

LE · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I love RFW, I just do.

It keeps newfags like me and others in check.

RFW! Letting everyone know the the truth!

ChronicEnturbulator · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Hubbard-Telescope;1065375 said:

Oh hai. Well, I just found out about this today, lol. Wow, Scientology thinks I'm a whole lot more bad ass and skilled with internetz than I am. :/ I'm not sure whether to be flattered? If only they knew the true extent of how really boring I am.

inb4 SWAT

iaxiloll · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061110 said:

RFW is namefagging some DC anons on RFW forum (names are xxxed out here)

Washington DC - Religious Freedom Watch Forums

Why does this page read like a monologue?

Washington DC - Religious Freedom Watch Forums

iaxiloll · Nov 14, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Magoo lol

Tory Christman | Religious Freedom Watch

she’s somewhat man hungry

exOT8Michael · Nov 15, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Should i use my RFW pic as an online dating photo?
)

LE · Nov 15, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

exOT8Michael;1066130 said:

Should i use my RFW pic as an online dating photo?
)

get yourself a hot piece of ass.

Smurf · Nov 15, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

exOT8Michael;1066130 said:

Should i use my RFW pic as an online dating photo?
)

Hombre already knows what you look like. :-P

LE · Nov 15, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

[STRIKE]They[/STRIKE] He sign(s) all [STRIKE]their[/STRIKE] his posts.
No wonder so many of the posts have been edited. Hard to remember who are are.

-1

Magoo · Nov 15, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

iaxiloll;1066033 said:

Why does this page read like a monologue?

Syndrome: "Oh ho ho! You sly dog! You got me monologuing! I can't believe it..."

Magoo · Nov 15, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

TICK TOCK DAVEY BOY, TICK TOCK

Magoo · Nov 15, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Magoo;1066794 said:

TICK TOCK DAVEY BOY, TICK TOCK

can one of you Anonymous people fix my smileys. It seems OSA doesn't want me to post smileys on wwp.

Magoo · Nov 15, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Can someone please change my avatar to Carol Channing?

30 YEARS!!

Log in or Sign up

OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

AngryGayPope1 Member

TehHerro Member

Bob Loblaw Member

AngryGayPope1 Member

DaveAnonymous Member

King Nerd Member

TehHerro Member

DeathHamster Member

Smurf Member

DeathHamster Member

Smurf Member

AngryGayPope1 Member

JohnnyRUClear Member

anonky Member

iaxiloll Member

anonky Member

iaxiloll Member

Sponge Member

DeathHamster Member

LE Member

Smurf Member

DaveAnonymous Member

Hubbard-Telescope Member

JohnnyRUClear Member

bastet Member

Herro Member

LE Member

Anonynamefag Member

LE Member

ChronicEnturbulator Member

iaxiloll Member

iaxiloll Member

exOT8Michael Member

LE Member

Smurf Member

LE Member

Magoo Member

Magoo Member

Magoo Member

Magoo Member

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Predefined Skins