OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Rather than start a separate thread; I figure that this is OSA related enough.

There's some website called ScientologyMyths or something like that. It tackles each and every subject you might wish to ask about. Their take on Lisa McPherson is very telling. Their whole explanation has this whiny defensive tone and it is almost obscene the way they portray those who were close to Lisa. Nowhere is there any sympathy for the woman or her family. You would think even for " PR " reasons they would show some empathy.

I never thought a lot about the woman, Ms McPherson; Scientology was already bad enough without knowing about her. It goes to show how far all this cult stuff can go when taken to it's ridiculous conclusion.

I wonder if anyone on the Religious Freedomwatch Forum has any sympathy.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I doubt they will ever admit she even existed.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

^are you the same LS that i know from nyc?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

So, if there are 25,000 members of this board, and we're all the same people with a bunch of socks, does that mean we have like 5 people with 5,000 socks apiece?

Except I only have one sock that I haven't used for awhile.

That means the other 4 of you have more like 6-7,000 socks apiece. Great job you guys!

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

If anyone from RFW is reading this, I'd like to know if what they are doing right now is the reason they got into scientology. Is this the total freedom that you were looking for? Defending human rights abuses that you may have never seen but your "donations" help perpetually perpetrate? Oh, it is? You sick, demented whack job!

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Interesting.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Joel Phillips is up to his usual crap again. This from Pooks on ESMB:

LOL! What a bunch of fucking retards.

I don't know if your familiar with Scn's hate site known as Religious Freedom Watch, but they recently set up a "forum", where a couple of OSA retards talk to each other.

This is a thread on me. As I was reading it I went into hysterical laughter at what a bunch of fucking retarded assholes these guys are. Apparently my mentioning that we should put together some kind of press pack for the Aussie Government really upset them.

Btw, that pic of me was taken by one of their PI's who went into Dunkin Donuts and covertly took a pic of me on "Freaky Friday". The girls at the shop all used to dress up in funny ways on Friday and have some fun. Enjoy!

Patty Pieniadz - Religious Freedom Watch Forums

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

RFW is the brainchild of Scientology stooge Joel Phillips & His wife, Chistina, or known by his Scilon friends, as "Tina". He long claimed that RFW was fully funded by him & his partners at American Coast Title, but recently his partner Frank Berriz disputed this, then Joel whined that critics were misprepresenting his being the sole financier of RFW. Joel was never one that could keep his facts (or lies) straight.

First he gloated:

"But, how do we do it? How do we keep RFW up and running? Well the financing is easy. It comes straight out of the profits of American Coast Title. That’s my company, I own it with Frank Berriz and Linda Blood. You would not find greater people anywhere except maybe the employees! We got plenty of legal advice on this and made a presentation to our underwriters at Stewart Title."

Religious Freedom Watch

Then he stepped back & whined:

Harassment Notice:

"Recently, unknown individuals have posted information on the internet stating that American Coast Title, Linda Blood, and Frank Berriz are affiliated with this website. These statements are false.

They are not affiliated in any way with RFW. They do not pay for any portion of this website nor do they share the views expressed on this site. Additionally, while the hateful postings say that Joel Phillips (the author of this site) wrote them, he did not. The information contained in the postings is false, and the postings do not reflect Mr. Phillips' views."

Religious Freedom Watch Defending Religious Rights

Say Hello to the doucebag:

:::~ American Coast Title ~:::

Check out his interesting Amazon profile. He refers to himself as "theprivateeye" & claims to live in Hemet. He lies. He lives in Pasadena:

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A19SDXWE5CR6R4]Amazon.com: Profile for Gumshoes[/ame]


776 S. Orange Grove Boulevard, Unit: NO 6, Pasadena, California 91105 | BlockShopper Los Angeles

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Forum is down due to thetans? lol

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Not for me ?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

::you don't need to see his identification::

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

From his profile at Amazon:

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I posted to soon. I see what was done there, Smurf.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

LOL.

I'd love to see Joel's explanation of how RFW was miraculously taken under Prolexic's protective umbrella at the same time as all of the other CoS's "official" web sites when the early DDoS battle started in '08.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

They won't be reading this. It's just a handful of scilons all circle jerking each other in a sad attempt to make the site look like it's some kind of hub of anti anonymous activity. The idiots don't even know not to post in bursts. You'll see a conversation in a thread between one of the seven users that show up on there and it all happens almost in real time, within second of each other. Even we don't reply to each other that fast, even in a very fast moving thread. Instead you see several people replying to what X said 2 mintues ago, the conversation begins to lag behind the actual real time events when you get that a lot of people on a thread because no one can keep up. These guys don't know how a real forum works. They have a site on the internet, but they have so little experience with it, it is laughable how they try to make a forum look real and miss something so obvious as don't all reply at once.

In a small forum like theres, unless they are all synchonizing watches and logging in and replying to each other at once, the replied would be staggered throughout the day, not all coming in a burst. You can see the there is at least a 30 second delay while they log out of one user and log into another to reply to themsleves. It's laughable.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

It wasn't all CoS's official sites, just the most important ones, and RFW.

If he doesn't want explain, then the details of the contract with Prolexic could be subpeenered in a courtcase.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

If Joel is trying to indicate that RFW has nothing to do with him, then why is his details contained in the whois for the site? lol

FLUNK!

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

since when does whois info mean a thing ?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

True, but when you add it to all the other evidence, it doesn't look too good for Joel...

I just checked their forums, and there is a new post today linking to a Freedom Magazine Dec/Jan special about the SP times - Freedom Magazine December/January 2009 - It should be good for a few lulz...

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Today is a good day to be a critic...

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Back around the time (pre-anon) that RFW is offering the award for info on various people (Baldy and the other voodoo wankans), there were a number of (probably) fake blog entries and press releases in the name of Joel and ACT. Is this a leftover from that period?