OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

If you cannot get number 4 right, you are pretty much dumb.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

That's the impression I get too. The conversation is too streamlined. Even Rondroids should have some sort of personality.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Is it similar to the Truthseeker/ Herro/Pierre/Zalgo mod apparancy?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Just had to see the site for myself.

I could only stand 2 minutes of it. Every poster is in complete agreement with the others. Lame, lame, lame.

If someone could join the forum and post an "I agree with all of you guys except for one small point" type post, then, I wonder what would happen?

But let's get real. We all know that is just not going to happen. They would never allow it.

This is worse than reading a "Freedom Mag".

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

That is one of the reasons I <3 this place, I can disagree and not got banned ;P

[mod]User was banned for this post[/mod]

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Some grammarfag mod could ban u for that alone.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

No, they are just your usual run-of-the-mill cunt, except the Zalgo thing which was kinda cool.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

They used to have a small group of posters to ARS, for years, who would do the same kind of thing with CCHR propaganda. They'd only reply to each others' posts (and probably couldn't see any other replies) and usually with 1-2 lines lines that boiled down to I agree or ^this. Several cycles of back and forth replies on each message. They've been gone for months now. Maybe they've been reassigned to RFW?

I've even seen in done IRL at a picket, between two handlers loudly having a conversation about one of the protesters as I walked back and forth in front of the org. After a few passes, I noticed that they were having the same conversation over and over in an endless loop. Hilarious ronbots!

I believe their technical term for it is dev-t or developed-traffic.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

FFS YOU RETARDS.

YOU CANNOT GET SOMEONES ADRESS/DOX FROM AN IP ADDRESS.

IF YOU REFUSE TO BELIEVE THIS; AND THINK OTHERWISE, THEN IT'S YOU MAKING THE INITIAL POSTULATE THAT IT IN FACT CAN: THUS THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU.

NOW: HERE IS MY IP ADRESS: *snip* NOW TELL ME WHO I AM?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Are you that guy from the Lifelock commercial?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

So that's why Scienos tend to repeat things endlessly?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

good point, i bow to zalgo

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

It's better when they do it back and forth in pairs. It's like synchronized bobbing birds.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Are you talking about WWP or the RFW forums? Because honestly your description works for both. Well except for "they would never allow it," that applies to the user base here, but not the staff. Actually, most of the criticisms and mocking of the RFW forums apply eerily well to WWP.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

1/10

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Oh look, a cliche, rote response. Now what was that one poster saying about the people at the RFW forums saying the same things over and over again?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Really? You're not even trying anymore are you? There are dissenting opines in most threads here while there are none on RFW. And if that was your idea of a troll then son I am seriously disappoint.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

^^^^^

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

You're a moron, there are numerous ways an IP address can be turned into an IRL address:

(A) Scan the system at the other end of it for vulnerabilities. Find vulnerability? If "yes," then exploit, elevate, and proceed to browse through any documents stored on the system; lift any passwords sitting around in IE/FF, and use them to access the related accounts (email, facebook, work/college logins etc.) Continue until person id'd.

(B) A legal pretext. IANAL, and I'm not going to throw out ideas, but I can think of a few false/somewhat false claims that could be made, that would at least have an even chance of causing your ISP to release the info. I'm pretty sure that a smart, devious lawyer could do much better.

(C) $$$ Pay for it. If the information exists, it can be bought. There's plenty of people in the PI world who make a perfectly good living from selling all sorts of "private" information. Most commonly, they know enough 'insider' lingo and procedures to be able to blag the information. Less frequently, they've got a staff member who'll sell it to them.

TL: DR You're a twat, and you're wrong.

[Should we be overly concerned by any of the above? Probably not. OSA are outgunned, outmanned, under powered and under siege. But better to play safe, and help keep it that way.]

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Now there's a word you don't hear to often in everyday life, especially from someone who's grammar is as poor as yours.

[Ducks, and awaits infraction for tinfoil.]

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Interesting choice of words.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

NO!

qed

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Alright, what the fuck is this? If this had a smidgen of truth this would have been all over WWP, and not just vaguely mentioned in this weird post in the TD.

San Jose Anonymous arrested - Religious Freedom Watch Forums

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Wow, they're really scraping the bottom of the barrel this time... always attack, never defend at its finest.

/r/ someone contact the San Jose police and find out if this has even a hint of truth to it.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

it is true , we are not sure of the charges i dont think,

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Oh, what the FUCK http://forums.whyweprotest.net/121-flash-raids/san-jose-dec-5th-prepare-black-pr-57922/

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

it gets talked about here

http://forums.whyweprotest.net/121-flash-raids/san-jose-dec-5th-prepare-black-pr-57922/3/

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Now I understand what the central argument that trolls have.

The only one; supposedly this forum is just another nerdy group like the one at the "Religious Purification Forum" over there.

This is supposed to be Anonymous though. The group without any leaders.

I don't need this forum. I just distribute flyers, and play pranks on a couple of orgs I know.

If I ever see any of you protesting I might be tempted to give one of you a fiver because you deserve it but I might be photgraphed as proof that I am an evil pysch paying off my evil thugs from Anonymous.

What do they always say? Ignore, ignore, ignore. But I'm not your damn leader. I just hate Scientology that criminal Cult Sventology. Oh sorry I spelled it wrong, I meant Scientology.

Es cee I,
Eeh en tea,
Oh elle oh gee why!

What's that spell?
What's that spell?

Scientology, that sleazy criminal cult Scientology started by a complete asshole called Laugh I Et Darn Old Hubbard. Oh sorry I spelled it wrong, His Name wuz: L. Ron Hubbard. He who shall be mentioned. Not that he deserves it.

If you only knew some of the things I've done to certain orgs. It's got a certain sense of humor. It makes me laugh and that's all that matters. It also serves them right.

And because I used to be a Brainwashed Scientologist; I know just how petty and sensitive they are because they believe in Ron. They actually do. They can take their James Bond delusions , and their lock-picking courses and you know what.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Cool story.....bro?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

RFW Forums now has a subforum called Discussion and Expose of Anonymous

(Joel fails at grammar, thanks to Study Tek)

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Thanks for the condom link, the first post one didn't work anyway (or now I should say).
I managed to read through several pages of 'They be bad, this is them, haters/terrorists, liars, uninformed, unemployed miscreants, blah-blah' before I puked a bit in my mouth.
As others have mentioned it does indeed seem to be a back-slappin' circle-jerk, but considering its RFW it is not at all surprising. Deep like a puddle of snake pee imho.
You'd think with '9million members' that forum would be rockin', erm, it'd be like, like, um, probably as pathetic as it already is, only bigger!
I have this disturbing image of two guys with their heads up their butts talking through a garden hose to eachother..........
.....time for a cocktail I think

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

and on it they namefag some londonfags.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I saw that too, they also mention some bullshit about how Anons under 18 get drunk at post raid.

To any Scientologist reading this - that is a lie. We are very responsible and I have never seen nor heard of this happening.

But then again it is Religious Freedom Watch so I don't know why I'd expect it to be anything other than 1 sided and wrong.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

alright, lets try this...

yeah, aren't the one's that are part of an organization that thinks they are better then everyone else, no one cared about palins email, and those of us in LA have seen much of there creepy and disturbing behavior they show off all the time, I mean come on how man times have I seen scilons stalking around in the subways, and then lie about it?

this from someone that follows the words of a man thats been a fugitive in at least a handful of countries and was to chicken shit to face up to his own crimes.

they learned how most of use are, and most of us are clean anyways (at least I'm sure most of us are) and we still come and nothing gets done to us

so despite all the photos, video, news reports both old and resent, court documents, leaked info, former members, first hand accounts and our own experiences we are the ones lying? right

I would like to see this sign

talking about us?

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Very nice Anti!

Hm, sounds like they were talking about themselves lol! (last quote)

Rock on Anons!

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

we need a www.whoisjoelphillips.com

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

My ego now.




My ego before.

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Wow- for a "church" with about a "billion" members and "growing" they certainly have the same few names posting, again and again!

I bet the sole poster about Blighty is Greame Wilson - who used to appear at raids looking like he'd just been goatsed!