OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Religious Freedom Watch Forums - Powered by vBulletin

Should Read This, posted to ARS

Tom Kruz said:

> Has anyone tried to register there?

Yes, I have registered 3 different accounts there via privately
operated proxies. The results were interesting...

The first account was created several days ago with an email address
from a non-mainstream provider. The information associated with the
account is of course false but nothing that would intentionally or
unintentionally raise any red flags (other than the obvious scilon
paranoia). In fact the persona I created for the account will generate
very specific results on a simple Google search and will go back
several years. The forum account was self activated but is still
awaiting posting approval from the administrator/moderators. When I
attempted to log in to the email account this morning I was greeted
with a security form - apparently someone had been attempting to gain
unauthorized access which caused the account to be temporarily locked
for security reasons. Of course the possibility of gaining access to
this account even through brute force methods would be significantly
difficult as it uses an extremely strong 32 character alphanumeric
password (including symbols).

The second account was created a couple of days later (using a
completely different proxy) on a popular mainstream provider. This one
was created with pseudo-stupidity in mind - e.g. tons of "personal"
information in the account profile. This too utilized a fairly strong
password BUT I decided to use the same password for both the email
account AND the RFW forum account. As of this morning the email
account had been accessed and the password CHANGED. The password was
easy enough to reset however and when I logged in all new messages in
the inbox had been marked as READ. Keep in mind this is a new email
account, which nobody except those at RFW would know about and used a
password strong enough to keep anyone out that DIDN'T have access to
it. The RFW forum account however has been deleted.

[Note: I will not comment on the third account for various reasons]

Encrypted connections were utilized for both sign up and logging into
the email accounts. In all cases a clean room sand-boxed OS running on
a locked research machine was used. Even the chances of a man in the
middle attack are ZERO - for reasons I will not get into.

EPIC FAIL - for not marking my inbox "unread"

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

oh lawdy

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

LMAO!!

where's their dome, though?

Little_Sister · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061023 said:

oh lawdy

Indeed!

Oh, the smiles that this new playground will give me...

Snake · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

See now why would they go and do something like that?

Might as well bend over with a lollipop sticking out of their ass.

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Oh, Joel Phillips has to know Anonymous is gonna raid the shit outta that. Don't forget proxy condoms ppl!

T.W.C_Anon · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Looks like something that Tom Newton aka Jacob Reist would do...

WTF · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061025 said:

LMAO!!

where's their dome, though?

wishful thinking

/drool

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061025 said:

LMAO!!

where's their dome, though?

Hm, no dome?

You know what that means.

DOME THE ENTIRE FORUM.

T.W.C_Anon · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061021 said:

Religious Freedom Watch Forums - Powered by vBulletin

Need >9000 socks (and Hero as a username)

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

sorta like the Hippie forum, except I bet they won't ask us to help them write a book

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Proxy-fied Link.

http://proxify.com/p/111010A1000100...967696f757366726565646f6d77617463682e6f72672f

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I smell a trap.

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

tell Baca

he always wanted to find a scilon forum

WTF · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061046 said:

Proxy-fied Link.

http://proxify.com/p/111010A1000100...967696f757366726565646f6d77617463682e6f72672f

I'm thinking that the server Le "misappropriated" and its website matrix have been re-labeled here.

The Dude Abides · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Some poor bastard drew the short straw and had to create ten or twenty screen names and now has to have conversations with himself on that board to make it look like people give a shit what the cult thinks

exOT8Michael · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I LOL'd hard at this!!
I even have a page of my own on RFW. I wonder what would happen if I tried to join.

Recovering Scientologist · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

The Dude Abides;1061050 said:

Some poor bastard drew the short straw and had to create ten or twenty screen names and now has to have conversations with himself on that board to make it look like people give a shit what the cult thinks

Haha. That's what it looked like to me too.

failboat · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

epic. win. potential.

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

/r/

lulzy screenshots as soon as Anonymous successfully trolls that forum

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

exOT8Michael;1061052 said:

I LOL'd hard at this!!
I even have a page of my own on RFW. I wonder what would happen if I tried to join.

Do eet! Like OSA has the balls to let you post.

ChronicEnturbulator · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061047 said:

I smell a trap.

^^^^ very much THIS

Little_Sister · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061056 said:

/r/

lulzy screenshots as soon as Anonymous successfully trolls that forum

That will take a bit, mods have to approve you before you post. They are probably going to be swamped for a while too, I have a feeling a lot traffic is suddenly going to hit that forum lol

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Little_Sister;1061065 said:

That will take a bit, mods have to approve you before you post.

Im shocked, just shocked.

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

man, that forum is disgusting and annoying

sage that shit

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I smell a trap, too.

It's too easy.

The Dude Abides · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061058 said:

Do eet! Like OSA has the balls to let you post.

Nobody gets to post except the person who got stuck with the job of setting that lame ass board up, the best part about it is the cult hasn't figured out that they are doing it strictly for our entertainment pleasure, it is about as lame as these sorry pages they created

Scientology - George Baillie a Scientologist - find out what I have gained from Scientology...

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anyone signing up should use names along with their theme. They have Vigilance, Freedom, Citizen... lol. Sign up with names like

TRUTH
JUSTICE
ETHICS
VIRTUE
CHARITY
HUMAN RIGHTS
MORALITY

Of course that's just assuming XENU and HERRO are already taken.

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061072 said:

man, that forum is disgusting and annoying

sage that shit

You can just feel the mind rape reaching out trying to grab you...

The Dude Abides · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061077 said:

Anyone signing up should use names along with their theme. They have Vigilance, Freedom, Citizen... lol. Sign up with names like

TRUTH
JUSTICE
ETHICS
VIRTUE
CHARITY
HUMAN RIGHTS
MORALITY

Of course that's just assuming XENU and HERRO are already taken.

How about

Dwarf
Midget
Little Fella
Tiny Dave
Little Davie Fail

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I bet the first thread they created was a "Donations" one

BusinessBecky · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

The Dude Abides;1061085 said:

How about

Dwarf
Midget
Little Fella
Tiny Dave
Little Davie Fail

-giggles- heh heh

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I lol'd! I mean, I really lol'd!!

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

The best names to choose are ones that contain:
8008
comm
ARC
Theta

as many YouTube scilon users have such a name

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

exOT8Michael;1061052 said:

I LOL'd hard at this!!
I even have a page of my own on RFW. I wonder what would happen if I tried to join.

Let me get this straight. You audited to OT8 and then they put you on RFW? Are you freakin' kidding me?

exOT8Michael · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous;1061092 said:

Let me get this straight. You audited to OT8 and then they put you on RFW? Are you freakin' kidding me?

No, it is awesome isn't it? LOL
jk
...but, yes you are right.
Might be because I sued them??

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

The negative Nightline show that Martin Bashir hosted recently was obviously intended to be an attack on the Church pushed by people with a known agenda. But, after talking to several friends who are not Scientologists, they felt the show was poorly put together and one for one ended up wondering why the show was done at all. Several commented on how ridiculous it was for Bashir to use a source after he had proved on the same show that he was a liar. The highlight was when they asked Mark Rathbun, "So are you lying now or were you lying then?" After some hesitation, Rathbun said, "Then."

Right.

But still, Bashir continued to use Rathbun as part of the show. By so doing, it became evident that Bashir didn't care whether Rathbun was a liar or not as long as he got his sound bites consisting of inflammatory allegations that were an attack on the Church and David Miscavige. Bashir needed these so that he could then go to Tommy Davis to try and put him on the spot by asking him to answer the allegations. The bigotry came through however when Bashir finally abandoned the allegations being made by the disgruntled apostates and focused on trying to ridicule points of the theology of Scientology itself.

It is too bad that ABC completely missed a chance to put in material about the true story of Scientology, what it is, what it does in the world to accomplish its mission. That would have been far more interesting IMHO.

lol

RaddaRadda · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

I assume that all attempts to sign up will be assumed to be from critics.

And that no new accounts will appear.

We shall see

The Dude Abides · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

RaddaRadda;1061102 said:

I assume that all attempts to sign up will be assumed to be from critics.

And that no new accounts will appear.

We shall see

There isn't going to be any new accounts, it's a spam board consisting of fake conversions, everything about the cult is fake, why would this board be any different?

Anonymous · Nov 10, 2009

Re: OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

RFW is namefagging some DC anons on RFW forum (names are xxxed out here)

Washington DC - Religious Freedom Watch Forums

I just got off the phone with a friend attending the Grand Opening of the new Church of Scientology in Washington DC. There are over 4000 people in attendance.

He told me there were a handful of hate mongers with masks, but no one is paying attention to them because they are cyber-terrorists. They are surrounded by police. The leader, he heard, is xxx.

***

That's what hate mongers do. They cannot even count as they claim 400 to 500 Scientologists in attendance. Well, we know they lie.

Does anyone know if xxx and her DC gang were also involved in the DDoS attack?

***

I love the fact that they spent weeks probably planning how to stop the Grand Opening... and they couldn't

***

It appears that their leader, xxx, plan to disrupt this religious event didn't work. Once again they showed their true colors.

***

There are several people both in DC and in Virginia who are going to look into these hate mongers.

The results will be posted to this forum. xxx is the most obvious one because she is the leader of the DC cyber-terrorist cell.

***

No one is paying attention because these clowns have yet to realize that their creepy little act has become tired, and no one cares. They may attract a few other creepy little cyber-antisocials here and there, but I've seen them show up at Scientology events and they are sad, and their numbers are dwindling.
RT

***

You are correct, but do not forget that they are cyber-terrorists as someone else pointed out in this thread already. They are psychotic and dangerous and have the ability to carry out any of the threats they make.

In fact, it was just discovered, that RFW was DDoS'ed after and Australian apostates told Anonymous to take down RFW, and they did. I have been told the information and evidence is being turned over to the concerned authorities.

In any event I spoke with people that were watching the DC Anonymous today. Interestingly enough xxx, yyy, zzz, aaa, bbb and others were identified and it appears that some kind of report is being filed.

***

I agree. These guys (and gals) have all the signs to do actions that could hurt people. They have already carried threats of many types and I am sure they will not stop any time soon attacking, as they are nuts.

Their numbers are very very small compared to their initial numbers, and I guess only the crazier ones are still around.

Price of freedom, remember!

***

I don't recall seeing a page on xxx in the Extremists section. It's always helpful to know more about these individuals and the holes they crawled out of. RFW does a great job of filling the vacuum of information on the crazies who attack our church. I use it all the time to help answer the questions of both Scientologists and non, and in fact turned two people on to it just today. It thoroughly handles people's questions when they read about the criminal acts these extremists have committed.

Citizen

***

Very true.

Without having truthful data about these people, it gets a bit overwhelming. But when you see some examples of the horrid choices that they have made, it is much easier to stay on plan, to focus on helping and getting the job done.

And like you say, it really helps give other people a heads up. I'll have to remember to point more people to RFW more often.

***

Introduction

A grandmother in Texas, visited by her two biracial grandchildren, is plagued by abusive phone calls, online harassment and a racist flyer posted in her neighborhood.

A 14-year old boy in Pasadena, California, who created a “no-cussing” club is deluged with hate e-mails and death threats—nearly 50,000 per day.

A hip-hop website is hacked and defaced with Nazi symbols, fake headlines and pictures saturated with racial slurs.

The common denominator in these incidents? “Script kiddies”1 and cyber bullies calling themselves “Anonymous,” who get their kicks from ruining other people’s lives.

For the past few years, Anonymous has mounted hate campaigns against selected targets, ranging from massive attacks that render websites inaccessible to spreading obscenities and degraded imagery on the Net.

< snip rest of long ass crazy rant >

Published with permission from Freedom magazine.

***

They are indeed as dangerous as they advertise, that is clear.

Their own “Anonymous Manifesto of Philosophic Condition” states: (among other things)

“Right or wrong? No. We destroy for destruction’s sake.”

And if that's the game they intend to play, they must be willing to also be caught at their destructive acts and face the consequences.

RT

Log in or Sign up

OSA's answer to WWP: RFW Forums

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

Little_Sister Member

Snake Member

Anonymous Member

T.W.C_Anon Member

WTF Member

Anonymous Member

T.W.C_Anon Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

WTF Member

The Dude Abides Member

exOT8Michael Member

Recovering Scientologist Member

failboat Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

ChronicEnturbulator Member

Little_Sister Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

The Dude Abides Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

The Dude Abides Member

Anonymous Member

BusinessBecky Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

exOT8Michael Member

Anonymous Member

RaddaRadda Member

The Dude Abides Member

Anonymous Member

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Predefined Skins