Customize

Operation Titstorm

Discussion in 'Freedom of Expression' started by urbanhawk, Feb 5, 2010.

  1. urbanhawk Member

    Operation Titstorm

    [mod]To those of you who are doing some sort of news piece on this or were directed here, read the WHOLE post before concluding this site's position on this

    (here's a hint, we don't like the censorship from Australia, but we don't condone the ddos attack from other portions of anonymous)
    [/mod]
    Well I was looking through /b/ today and i came across this posted up there

    their flyer is this 1265676111124.jpg?t=1265680254.jpg

    The text posted along side it is:
    The short and long of this is that on February 10th at 8:00 am they are going to launch a massive DDoS attack on the government servers as well as a flood of our other fun techniques for causing hell for others(black faxes, prank phone calls, spam emails, etc...).

    I want your guys opinions on how this operation of 4chan's may help/hinder our cause against the church of scientology in australia. I also want to know how to do damage control. currently it is sitting at 194 posts on 4chan, as of the moment, with most of them positive.(or at least as positive as /b/ can get).

    [mod]mod update[/mod]
    Yeah, we don't support their ddos attack methods, as they will get people v& and it doesn't get much support from the public (which is needed to stop the censorship)

    Models considered "less endowed" are being banned by the tyrannical regime being put in place by some old, white Australian senators. An end will be put to this horrible discrimination by any legal means necessary.
  2. Anon123456 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    my opinion is that it could help or hurt us. lulz
  3. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Unproductive, unless you seek as much negative press for Anonymous as possible. If that is your goal, you are on the side of the cult. If that is so, please an hero whist you DIAF. Thank you.
  4. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    You're a chanologist, which is merely a fraction of anonymous users. If you wanted a squeaky clean image you should have made up your own shit instead of deciding you're going to be "Anonymous" and spewing memes.

    As far as "being on the side of the cult goes" the internet censorship in australia is far more troubling and a much greater problem than the CoS in australia ever be. If you can't pull your head out of your obsessive ass long enough to see that I'm not really sure what can help you other than sticking your head in a blender.
  5. Major Boyle Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Far better to spam the net and show how internet controls are pointless, since images can be uploaded ANYWHERE and links posted ANYWHERE. I think mocking the douche would be highly effective. For example, a press release asking how big do a woman's boobs have to be in order to not be considered child porn? Do man boobs count? Are boobs with implants considered to be actually smaller than the size of the implant? Also, if a woman wear and abaya or chaddor or other Muslim clothes, does her boob size count? Also, if you are going to have a mandatory boob size, how will you be able to measure a photo? How big are Rudd's boobs? Dpes simulate child porn include Gumby, who runs around naked? What about Kangaroo porn, since they're nude? What a bout sheered sheep than are completely naked? How about whale porn? They're nude too.
  6. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I do not have small breasts, and do not like to look at pics of small breasts, so my opinion is "meh".
  7. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    My opinion is that you fail at internets.
    Go back to gaiaonline.

    Edit: there is already a thread on this subject,
    in the "black ops" subforum of WWP.

    If you can find it. Do your duty.
  8. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    There's not much point in trying to stop it because it can't be stopped. There's not much point in trying to convince them not to do it because that will just draw fire. It would be likely that some anons are involved in both this and Chanology.

    Best thing Chanology can do is make sure Xenophon knows its coming so he can be prepared for any backlash related to Aaron Saxton protesting with us. Anyone can be anonymous doesn't mean it's "us" doing this. This is where some of us came from, can't be afraid of who we were or whatever.

    tl;dr fuck it
  9. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I know that much already. I was simply asking your opinions on how it would affect the faction of anonymous which is Chanology. That and how to do damage control for this so that when they do carry it out it won't backlash as hard against us and limit it's negative effects on our specific cause. I do agree with telling Xenophon ahead of time since that would be wise. I think it also wise to inform him that it is not the faction of anonymous which is chanology which is carrying out this attack and that we do not have a roll in it. The last thing we need is for the cult to start pointing fingers at us and exclaiming how much bad people we are and twist it against us when we in truth did nothing. The least we can do is cover our behinds.
  10. Tenebrous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Some of you people are more worried about what's going to happen to chanology's image in australia than you are about the internet censorship that they're trying to impose?

    Really?

    remiqnet_2719.gif
  11. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Things change. Anonymous is smart, efficient and successful in it's white ops in bringing the cult down.

    /b/ is still pulling asshat pranks that the cult will quickly put to use in the media, stoking the fires in their brainwashed clients,and everything we've seen before.

    We've seen it didn't work well the first time. DDoSing is a teen age prank that is fail.

    If you feel that /b/ and anonymous are two separate entities you'd be right.

    You have notified OSA that you want to coordinate an illegal act. Please, put your head in a blender. I'm sure it's pointy enough, loser. Thanks alot. Another shitty idea the rest of us will have to un-fuck.
  12. Tenebrous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    The chans don't give a shit about what ammo they're giving the CoS because it's fucking old news. Your "amazingly effective irl protesting" hasn't done shit since last year.

    Also,you don't have to clean any of it up because the world doesn't give a flying fuck about chanology so as to require any press releases or opinion views from asshats such as yourself. Most people, if they know anything about it at all, just think it's a bunch of sad nerds dancing outside on the sidewalk once a month (which is trufax).

    Do everyone a favor and just go stand out on the street spouting memes while other people worry about some of the actual serious issues going on in our world today.
  13. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    like small-breasted pr0n, amirite?
  14. Anon123456 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    but i dont live in australia and could give a fuck if they get censored. any public that would stand by and let this happen deserve the result. DDOS is fail not only for the cause of fixing that shit, its also fail because when you DDOS scientology nobody gives a fuck. when you DDOS a gov server . people will hunt you down. i support australians but FFS how did it even get this far?
  15. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I'm all for what they are going to try to do. However regardless of wether or not you support them or oppose them, as stated before, nothing we can do can stop them even if we wanted to. What i want to do is damage control so that when they do carry it out it will cause the minimum amount of damage to our cause against the cult as it can. Remember that Chanology is only a small faction of anonymous dedicated to the dismantling of the church of scientology. The issue of internet censorship does not fall on our shoulders but rather falls into the hands of the rest of anonymous.


    /b/ is to anonymous as a cell is to your own body. Unless you are willing to start stating that your brain cells are not part of your body then i think that we can say that you are wrong.
  16. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    [SIZE="3"]Kilroy was here[/SIZE]
    styxmrroboto.jpg
  17. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Hey the cult is already trying to label us as terrorists and as you put it once you mess with the goverment things start getting messy. If we don't do damage control then they really will be capable of truthfully calling us terrorists for attacking a government. Besides the rest of the anons might not care what we do but we we care.
  18. Tenebrous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I doubt that you're dumb enough to actually think that's the big issue.

    And honestly will ddosing them make a difference? As an attention gaining device maybe, but if you mean whether or not it will bring ausfailia to it's knees, then that's an obvious no.

    Personally I find it to be a cop-out to simply say "well, it's not my backyard". Every country pulls its share of oppression and retardation on its people, and it certainly doesn't hurt to have some backup. I imagine some of the exes know that feeling.
  19. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    There's a false choice going on here. It doesn't have to be "do something massively illegal or do nothing like a pussy."

    Nobody is saying people should be unconcerned about the internet censorship. The point some are trying to make is that launching DDoS attacks on a government is illegal and unnecessary. Another couple of teenagers are going to end up v& and government officials may then use the illegality of the DDoSers' message to ignore or discredit their claims and push for even more controls on your tubes.
  20. Anon123456 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    point taken
  21. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

  22. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm


    I was being sarcastic. Breasts of ALL sizes are valuable.

    <There's no apostrophe in "its knees", btw.>
  23. Tenebrous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    This entire thing was started over free speech issues.
  24. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    inb4threaddomed. later, off to do something productive. Good luck on attacking government servers, sucker. Let us know what your new relationship is like in prison.
  25. Tenebrous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    You're right, if I wanted to do something productive i'd have logged on to the iran site instead.
  26. urbanhawk Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Yes i know that however it has since evolved. What i am trying to point out is the fact that Chanology's main concern is the dismantling of the church of scientology. The censorship in Australia falls outside the domain of Chanology. All that we really can do is decide how it will affect our stance against the cult and make sure that it does not sink our boat.
  27. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Australians have been protesting against the planned censorship, and the media has repeatedly exposed the flawed logic, ineffectiveness and potential for misuse of the filter by governments attempting to stifle criticism. The politicians say they are doing it anyway.

    Personally I don't support any DDoS (or any illegal activity for that matter) because the filter proponents would just say "look this is proof that the internetz are nasty! We must control it!"
  28. Re: Operation Titstorm

    VPN.
  29. Anon123456 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    what if CNN was on a VPN? would you read it?
  30. happy feet Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I want a Titstorm dome!! make me proud.
  31. rof Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    NO TITSTORM FOR YOU

    GET OUT
  32. Herro Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Chanology isn't a part of anonymous, period. They're separate. If you clowns could get that through your thick skulls you wouldn't have these problems.
  33. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Why do you think it is called CHANology, retard?
  34. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Born from the chans. Are you now saying that only the chans can be anonymous? Or that anonymous can only be from the chans?
  35. Erra Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    2 whole pages of idiots and absolutely NO TITS?

    Fuckin fuck
  36. Fuckeye Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Stop being a page ahead then, this is page 1.
  37. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    I am saying that chanology clearly is part of anonymous and that Herro is a retard for claiming that it is not.

    Also regardless of whether it hurts Chanology's cause or not, this op is idiotic and ineffective. At least if you claim you would be doing it for "free speech" and against net censorship and not just for the lulz. What do you think DDOSing will achieve for free speech? It will only strengthen the governments resolve to put tighter controls on the net.
    Why not do IRL protests?
  38. Skeptic1337 Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    This is simplistic thinking.

    The purpose of a ddos (unless it's against a commercial enterprise) is to garner attention and focus people on a subject. People who will PA and do a IRL protest if they see the need is great.

    The concept that governments are not of the people is too many of you retards listening to elrushbo or watching msnbc/cnn thinking that's news and that's how the world works. You need to snap the fuck out of it.

    Any ways, Chanology (ie the chans run this) died so long ago the corpse is fucking dust. Stop pretending this something akin to that. It's CHANology in name only much like a bunch of people wearing GF masks are Anonymous (capital A there).

    I've come to realize that without some artistic fagmastering all these free speech projects will die on the vine (as they should). I could probably write a Consensus TLDR post about this (by this meaning how you should harblecake such an enterprise) the likes of which r3x's code of trollshido / vibe / insane cocksuckery would be jealous. I just don't give a fuck about it. I care little to nothing about some retarded aussies that can't find a way to PA their own for a good cause. We have here in the US so many more important things to worry about at the moment that unless you got mommy or daddy or a trust fund paying for your shit then you should be out learning how to fix your fucking future because at this fucking rate it's going to bleak.

    Any ways carry on with your chanology=anonymous=roiders=getafuckingclue as has always been done. It's a fascinating debate.
  39. YAHRLY Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    someone got laid off didn't they?
  40. Anonymous Member

    Re: Operation Titstorm

    Why not directly start off with a IRL protest then and skip the DDOS part? IRL protests have three advantages
    1. they are legal
    2. they garner more attention than DDOS, which will rightfully be attributed by the media to a bunch of retarded script kiddies who have no clue what they are doing anyway.
    3. they convey a clearer message, than just haxxoring the governments server or spamming porn all over the place

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins