Labor claim against organized scientology - more important information As covered in earlier posts there is now a suit filed against organized scientology for their gross violations of the labor laws and related matters. Marc (BlownForGood) is the defendant. As I said in an earlier post, there were two others to be in the complaint with Marc but they were intimidated by organized scientology into dropping out before the formal suit was filed. Marc also talked about this point in a posting he made at: Operation Clambake Message Board :: View topic - BLOWN FOR GOOD LAWSUIT IN CALIFORNIA In part, Marc said: QUOTE "As Larry Brennan mentioned in a post somewhere, there were a few others that were also part of the initial complaints that were filed. These names were intentionally listed to test what would happen with these people. Within hours of the complaints being filed, these people’s families were contacted and eventually some of these people would drop out of the case. The intimidation was swift and effective. This was expected and predicted. It was also illegal. So be it. It just made the case that much stronger. Additional evidence that backs up the case is created by the Scientology enterprise daily". END QUOTE Organized scientology thinks that by intimidating these two into pulling out that the information relating to their abuses of these two has forever been kept from the public eye. I don't think so! Here is a link to what in effect is a copy of administrative complaint filed before the suit when the other two were listed in the complaint. It gives more details of organized scientology's attempts to hide behind religious cloaking as well as details of abuses of these two and others as well. (The changes to the original filing in pdf format are that I copied it onto a clipboard and then pasted it into word so that I could remove the names of the other two people so as to ensure their privacy. Then, with help, I got the amended document put back into a pdf file. This resulted in the following changes from the original doc: 1) the layout and paging is slightly different, 2) fonts and sizing are a bit different and 3) the names of the two who dropped out were deleted). Here it is: [ame="http://www.scribd.com/doc/10094807/Admin-Complaint"]Admin Complaint@@AMEPARAM@@/docinfo/10094807?access_key=key-2omgg211f2xz6re8pjr2@@AMEPARAM@@10094807@@AMEPARAM@@key-2omgg211f2xz6re8pjr2[/ame] If this does not come out clearly, anyone feel free to put a copy someplace where others can easily get to it. So, OSA's attempt to hide this information through intimidation is FAIL. There it is. The only way that they will get away with terrible abuses of staff and others is by keeping it hidden. That's not going to happen here.