Customize

Jan Eastgate Pre-trial Court Mentions

Discussion in 'Leaks & Legal' started by Anonymous, Sep 13, 2011.

  1. Anonymous Member

    • Like Like x 2
  2. Anonymous Member

    The court replies:

  3. Sponge Member

    In the previous court mention (18th August) it was specifically noted as "Online Court". For tomorrow's it says "Crt. 4.4".

    I don't think Janice Eastgate Meyer has to be present at any of these "mentions" according to previous dox.

    This was the last dox from August:
    http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/5603/scn0002b.jpg
    http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/9567/scn0003p.jpg
    The "balance of the brief" should have been served by the 8th September and the matter listed online 15th September, "to fix a conference timetable".
  4. BLiP Member

    Yep - as I read the court DOX from the last appearance, JAN EASTGATE can remain at large (in the US) on bail for so long as the proceedings remain "on-line".

    inb4yearsandyearsandyearsoflegalfilingsanddelays
  5. Anonymous Member

    Disgusging bitch Jan Eastgate is alleged to have coached a kid who was raped by a $cientologist to keep quiet to protect the cult's reputation.

    It's important to mention that for Google purposes and casual readers of this site.
    • Like Like x 3
  6. Random guy Member

    Indeed.
  7. Anonymous Member

    And dox on what and why Scientologists do what they do and don't, faithfully and how 1984 their version of "ethics" and "justice" really is. Let me amend. This is Hubbard's laws. Not all adhere to it or believe it all.

    http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/crime-syndicate-ethics.htm
  8. Anonymous Member

  9. Anonymous Member

    Anonymous delivers.
  10. Anonymous Member

    In this case, Anonymous had nothing to do with it.
  11. Random guy Member

    True, but we're going to make sure this one doesn't go down quietly.
  12. Anonymous Member

    Word!
  13. Anonymous Member

    [IMG]
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Anonymous Member

    I wouldn't be so sure.
  15. Anonymous Member

    dox?
  16. Anonymous Member

    stfu
  17. Anonymous Member

    no-u1.jpg
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Anonymous Member

    Jan Eastagte (Meyer) does have something to do with it.

    So i expect to see everyone else in the world or on the internet to have something to do with it also right?

    Or is it down to the poster to do it all.
  19. Anonymous Member

    image1.png
    • Like Like x 4
  20. Anonymous Member

    Cult spin on this case, when finally pushed to the point that they have to confront it, is that Eastgate was merely acting on the childs behalf out of concern for her welfare, lest she be delivered into the hands of teh evil psychs.

    I fucking hope that she try's using this defense in court.
    • Like Like x 1
  21. Sponge Member

    I notice now that the entry changed to: "online court". I don't suppose anyone knows what went on?

    janeastgatecourt150911.jpg
  22. Anonymous Member

    what happened?
  23. TinyDancer Member

    Awaiting transcript from confused court staff.
    • Like Like x 2
    • Like Like x 2
  24. Sponge Member

    I lurve you.
    • Like Like x 2
  25. Anonymous Member

    * WHAT HAPPENED? *

    I'm dying here.
  26. Anonymous Member

    whaaaaaat haaaaaaappened?
    • Like Like x 1
  27. Random guy Member

  28. THESE
    • Like Like x 1
  29. Anonymous Member

  30. Anonymous Member

    what happened?
  31. Anonymous Member

  32. I khan.jpg 't wait to find out what happened.
    • Like Like x 4
  33. Anonymous Member

    see below - docs missing from foi request from witness - 3 weeks delay requested to obtain missing/edited information.

    scn0002b.jpg
    • Like Like x 2
  34. Anonymous Member

    we should be able to obtain a conference timetable from the court now?
  35. Anonymous Member

    LOL they think deliberately dragging this case out will make it go away.
  36. Thanks Anon.

    Is Ken Madden a Scientology lawyer or a hired gun?
  37. Sponge Member

    That was the "balance of the brief" they were talking about and the three weeks later for it to be served was September 8th as noted in that August 16th & 18th Mention. The next court date, the Sept 15th mention (for which we don't yet have dox for) is where I'd expect the docket to show that the balance of brief was indeed served, plus any other useful info and finally a date for the next event. It suggests some sort of "conference timetable" but I'd just like to know how much more faggotry there is going to be before we finally get that bitch hauled back in to face the actual charges, make a damn plea and get this show on the road?
    I'd have loved this to have gotten to the plea stage before the IAS event at St.Hill to give DM some more ulcerated butthurt.
    • Like Like x 2
  38. RightOn Member

    sooo.....
    anyone know how often she used to travel to AU?

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins