Help plan OPS

http://www.bridgingfreedom.org/therapeutic-safe-home/
Ophealinghands?
Raise funding for awareness and acceptance?
Why do the criminals get remembered but the victims forgotten?

http://anonhq.com/opexposecps-anonymous-targets-child-protective-services/

This deserves its own sticky thread

Everything ends.
It was beautiful, and will be unforgetable.
Thank you from the heart ...
to everybody.

What happened ?

Not sure if this is the correct place to post this, I'm new here and cannot yet create a new thread.

I'd thought I'd alert you to some very unusual symbolism used by a south african clothing company. If you have a way of investigating this and make sure that nothing unusual is going on that would be great, thanks.

Watch this video, especially at around 14 seconds:


Notice the guy walking with the view on his pants and then straight to the kids face as though he's looking at the guys crotch in a sexually suggestive way.

Now these are advertising people that create this, they know about human psychology and how it would be interpreted. Every detail of these videos would be analyzed before they're broadcast. The psychological effect of this is so blatantly obvious that they must have intended it.

The next video:


Now think about this in the context of what Ella Draper's whistleblowing kids have been saying about child abuse and murder in their hampstead school and what Kevin Annett and so many others have been saying about children being sacrificed by these systems that do this.

Notice at 26 seconds what seems to symbolize a kid getting killed. They even have another kid with a camera as though they're filming a snuff movie.

Some of those involved in such things seem to be thinking that the world will accept it which of course it won't, although it could do things for us in revealing the truth.

The exploitation of children for advertising purposes is always repulsive.

If anyone in the country of origin of this advertising complains to the Advertising Council Of Standards for that country (assuming there is one) action will be taken against the advertiser.

As for Kevin Annett - he's produced no evidence whatsoever for his claims. His batting average is zero.

I don't know anything about Ella Draper. Got documentation for your claims?

On the 26 second mark , second video, where I paused it there was a small child shaking her head and laughing, I saw nothing to suggest anything sinister at all throughout the entire thing.

Re Ella Draper and the kids I get the feeling Gabriel has been coached . If it turns out I'm wrong come back to remind me of it and I'll hold up my hands.
Under any other circumstance I would always believe the child.




Night Owl if you want a link to Ella Draper I'll gladly provide it for you.

I would prefer you providing me with more verbal rebus puzzles...

No derails.

Man, you really have a dirty mind.

That's called a magic trick. Kids love them.

I didn't see any camera, only popcorn and 3D glasses.


It looks like you suffer from a deep web overdose.

Frame by frame I went through it twice and found nothing to give me cause for concern.
Normally chaperones or parents, occasionally both, are present when children are participating in filming for commercial purposes and I'm certain if anything untoward was taking place they would object.

From 26 seconds. Clearly you don't have the intelligence to notice anything of any significance otherwise you would know what I was referring to even if you don't agree with what I'm saying. You think Gabriel's been coached, they've got medical reports to verify what they've been saying.

John Duff, the kid should not be made to look like he's staring at the guys crotch. That's obviously intentional.

Again, you lack intelligence because the camera that I'm referring to is a fake cardboard one that's meant to symbolize a real camera.

You don't even notice these things regardless of whether you agree with what I'm saying or not. With you it's not even a question of interpreting it in the same way as what I am, you're not even seeing what's there regardless of interpretation. That's a question of intelligence or lack thereof.

Methinks we have a Kevin Annett impostor in our midst. It demonstrates the same modes of attack if fault is found with its claims.

Kevin ran away when requests for evidence were made.

Rick, all you've shown to me in the videos is the mindless exploitation of children for advertising purposes. Does the advertising appeal to pedophiles? It's possible, but I don't know. I can't take your word for it. It's too lame.

You employed the term "medical". You clearly don't have the intelligence to notice that this is a reference to "playing doctor", therefore encouraging sexualization of children.

You are saying I lack intelligence and you are scolding me. Children are often thought to lack intelligence. Clearly, this is representative of child molestation.

Are you here to promote child abuse and molestation ?
Just kidding of course : I just wanted to show you how all this sounds to me.

I don't read these that often because I'm not going to waste time with funny little men that have infiltrated anonymous to try prevent things from being investigated that should be investigated.

Fascinating how when I refer to evidence, the medical reports, that indicate that the hampstead whistle blower kids are telling the truth you then try and joke about it and avoid the fact that it is actually factual evidence.

You sound like an idiot trying to be clever and you're just embarrassing yourself trying to argue against me, avoiding the evidence and not even seeing what I'm referring to regardless of interpretation.

I'm actually a qualified scientist, we don't think based on coincidence, we think based on logic and evidence.

The truth is those that are doing these things would try and infiltrate anonymous. There are a lot of people out there that are controlled, that is blackmailed with closet homosexual, child abuse and other such things.

It's the same story with governments...etc. They get those with these things on them to infiltrate those that can do something about it.

The question is what are anonymous going to do about it and prevent the effects of being infiltrated by them.

Bill nye the science guy isn't actually a qualified scientist, he just wears a white coat a says shit.
Just saying.

Forget the muppet infiltration it happens on every forum and this one is no exception some of them have proved to be quite entertaining too.

Where is the evidence you refer to?

Background for anyone interested as follows.

FOOTNOTES
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/114...ir-father-was-leader-of-Satanic-sex-cult.html

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/gareeva-dearman-2015.pdf

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime..._allegation_welcomes_judge_s_ruling_1_4001462


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/11483750/Evil-mother-tortured-children-into-telling-police-their-father-was-leader-of-Satanic-sex-







cult.htmlhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ella_Draper


My source is listed above.

The evidence that I refer to is actually in the judgment link that you posted above:

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/gareeva-dearman-2015.pdf

Read paragraphs 119 to 132 where Dr Hodes who examined the kids mentions several times how the findings of the examination are consistent with what the kids have alleged and indicate sexual abuse.

The judge's verdict doesn't mean a thing when the british establishment is sick and controlled with child abuse, closet homosexual and other such things.

You would trust a british judge when one of charle's closest friends was jimmy savile the worst know pedophile in british history? What do you think that says about how sick britian is?

Think logically about what that implies. Do you think that the british intelligience agencies would have not known about jimmy savile? Everyone that get's anywhere near charles would be investigated. The worst known pedophile in british history would never have been able to conceal that from british intelligence. They obviously would have known, what do you think that implies about others such as judges and the judge for the whistleblower kids case?

The judge says the case was thouroughly investigated, it wasn't really investigated at all. The kids described in detail tattoos, piercings, birth marks..etc on their abusers and none of the abusers were examined. Some of the most important evidence in the case that could prove or disprove it and they didn't even bother to examine any of them.

Another thing where logic also proves the truth of this is that Elle Draper and Abraham Christie, the mother of the kids and her boyfriend, would never have made this up because they would have known that the intricate details regarding tattoos and such things in private areas that the kids provided would have been disproved on examination.

They would never get the kids to say something where it would just result in it being proven that they were lying. So Elle and Abraham almost certainly are telling the truth.

Why would the judge and others in the british establishment not see the logic of that and instead make out as though Elle and Abraham were forcing the kids to say those things? Because they're being controlled with it. Child abuse, child murder...etc is being used to control them. They're been controlled with these things just like those that are trying to infiltrate anonymous are controlled with it.

Those within anonymous need to think for themselves, don't be influenced by those that are trying to infiltrate, investigate things, do what you can and then provide the information for the rest of us.

At the moment I'm focusing on this whole ordeal with LionMaker Studios. Before you tell me, yes this is something that will come and go, and I know that. I plan to milk it as much as fucking possible. Of course I'm doing this all under OpDeathEaters, though I do feel there should be an OP specifically for finding and exposing individual pedophiles, rather than groups and organizations. That and everyone supporting OpDeathEaters at the moment don't seem to take a liking towards aggressive tactics, those being denial of service attacks, etc... If you ask me these sick fucks deserve every bit of force you or I could throw at them.