Re: Gameday 3/3 - Ordinance #884 This is not about saying her opinion is correct. This is about saying that she is not just another attorney. She is THE attorney. She has voiced what their intent was with the ordinance. She has voiced their INTENT when it comes to enforcement. She has voiced what their INTENT is as to where you should be allowed to protest. Later, their INTENT will be most relevant in a challenge. She brandished around the concept that the San Diego law was upheld by the 9th circuit as if that was a blanket approval of the law. IT IS NOT. The Supreme Court reversing the decision on Frisby is not a blanket approval of this law. Frisby banned all residential picketing and SCOTUS upheld it. Hey, 884 law is more lenient than Frisby so all is well. It isn't. Protesters must have ample alternative means of communication. They did in Frisby. They don't at Gold Base. As Buster pointed out, the word "particular" is going to be one of the words that causes them a problem. According to a literal translation of the law, you can target RESIDENCES...with an "S"...and we know what will happen if you do. Scientology will try to have you arrested. Again, saying she is not just another attorney has nothing to do with elevating her status of right and wrong. It has to do with the fact that she is THE author of the ordinance. You will see how it plays into an argument if someone gets busted. Perhaps then you will understand. And yes, anyone Protesting at Gold needs to have her comments cued up and ready to go when the cops are giving you a hard time and DOCUMENT THAT YOU SHOWED IT TO THEM. At the very least, have it transcribed on paper to hand them.