Ex-Anonymous Hackers Plan To Out Group’s Members

Anonymous · Mar 24, 2011

"Anonymous said: ↑

COOCHIE COO !!!!!!1!!1111111!

teh image got a-swallowed up of my Charo.

TanDon · Mar 25, 2011

Okay sober, but I just noticed something there is no button to describe my dislike for most news articles on the interwebz.

PresidentShaw · Mar 25, 2011

Anonymous · Mar 25, 2011

Anonymous said: ↑

I calmly shoot you.

I am attractive and I dodge.

Anonymous · Mar 25, 2011

Anonymous said: ↑

I calmly shoot you myself.

I kindly thank you.

Anonymous · Mar 25, 2011

Anonymous said: ↑

So this comic book noir of a story keeps getting deeper.

I just got done re-watching all the media coverage were a member of anon was present.
I also went over all the chat logs both ones that were posted in news and media as well as my own collection for private record keeping.
After talking with some people whom I will not name I have come to the following conclusions.

1. Anonymous dose have organizers, they act sometimes in a leadership capacity but have no actual position as a leader. They also have no more power or sway to generate consensus then any other given member of anonymous.Example: When D was in the new york protest and told an anon with a camera to film the crying scientologist in the window. The anon did it not because D is a leader but because an idea was shared and a consensus was met.

2. It is up to the individual members of anon to get involved with what goes on in these irc rooms so that a more fair consensus can be generated. If YOU as a person want to influence WHAT anon does then you need to go through the trouble of posting on the forums and chatting in the irc to voice your unique oppinion so that at the very least it is considered.

3. When ever a single anon does something by themselves with no opinions, consensus or assistance from others of any kind they are not acting as anon. If a member of anon steals from a bank they are not stealing from a bank as a member of anon they are doing so as themselves because it is presumably for their own purposes and not those of anon. If a single anon generates a reasonable consensus and then acts on that consensus then for better or worse it is anon that has done this. However anon is not a single entity but a lovecraftian behemoth with variable branches and tendrils that reach out in all directions.

4. There ARE members of anon that are WAY WAY more active then other members and because of that they have assumed consistent names. I am referring to Q, K and D. Q is well just Q,K is obviously Kayla and D is probably none other then Darviela Maravarona. Just because they are named and appear in the media or coordinate various efforts both public and private dose not mean they are any more or less anon then anybody else. This is because they follow the golden rule of the hive mind which is to generate consensus. That's just how hive minds work, many minds throw ideas and concepts around until something sticks and becomes consistent.

And then there is anonsparrow.

Herro · Mar 27, 2011

Skiddies getting involved in sissy e-fights? Truly this is unprecedented!

KittyKatSpanker · Mar 27, 2011

Herro said: ↑

Skiddies getting involved in sissy e-fights? Truly this is unprecedented!

there will be some job lost

Log in or Sign up

Ex-Anonymous Hackers Plan To Out Group’s Members

Anonymous Member

TanDon Member

PresidentShaw Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

Anonymous Member

Herro Member

KittyKatSpanker Member

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Predefined Skins