DRAMA~~I Was Told To Come To You~~DRAMA (Part 1)

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Anonymous, Apr 5, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Anonymous Member

    In the same, if you're going to apply if, then fallacies... then little Sue, your own response claiming that sethdood obviously doesn't have something better to do with his time than waste it and yours falls flat when you indeed must suffer from the same ill which you accuse him of.

    You're doing just what others are accusing the mods here of: going against an individual poster just because you don't agree with what he/she is saying. No need to get metaphysical in saying that there's a difference between what you're saying and what others will perceive you're saying and the following that by being completely unauthentic in quoting a big philosopher. For authenticity's sake: ORIGINAL CONTENT ONLY. Not copy pasta, bitch.

    Maybe you won't be able to take that "bitch" thrown in there for your delight.

    And fyi, there are many logical explanations as to why this thread is exploding like a shitstorm. If you cared to look at the picture from your opponent's point of view, if only for the sheer sake of argument, you'd understand this. That's what a good argument is, one in which both parties are willing to explore the pros and cons of both points of views. I considered both and I say this: suck my balls. Since you don't try hard at all, then it shouldn't be hard at all for you.
    • Like Like x 2
  2. anonsoldier Member

    I would just like to point out that WWP is a privately owned forums and thus is not subject to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. No such thing as free speech here.
    • Like Like x 5
  3. sue Administrator

    I am not seeing how you came to the conclusion that i would consider having any ill will would be beneficial to me or the site, i much rather not spend keystrokes discussing things in the manner they have as there so far has not been one iota of constructive debate on the subject.
    Regarding the authenticity pun, fairly predictable but clever nonetheless, with the slight caveat that i am not vehemently clutching on this conceived notion of what the only way of being an authentic anon is, nor have i the notion that i speak for anonymous, i simply speak as a wwp admin arguing that while free-speech is sacred the definition of it varies from person to person --in the case of wwp our desire not to host or embed pornographic content as it is and has been well known against the commonly accepted rules. You might want to kick up a storm but i am not seeing it, sorry to mock your drammatic performance but a dozen juveniles would have put up more of a pantomime, in comparison to the less than handful "adults" throwing a hissyfit clamoring for keyboard warrior badges.

    This discussion is absurd, on so many levels that i do not comprehend where you draw this sense of self righteous entitlement from.
    To remain very authentic : first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
  4. veravendetter Member

    • Like Like x 1
  5. Anonymous Member

    So, how about those Scientologists? Pretty crazy huh?
    • Like Like x 9
  6. Anonymous Member

    @ OP et al:
    dunno what exactly you've been told, but...

    • Like Like x 2
  7. Miranda Member

    • Like Like x 2
  8. Anonymous Member

    • Like Like x 2
  9. veravendetter Member

    I herd their bad guys.
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Anonymous Member

    • Like Like x 1
  11. Anonymous Member

    Nope, you seem to be hanging on to a sturdy notion of what it means to be worthwhile. When you say, "i simply speak as a wwp admin," I agree - for you speak rather simply. Yet you feel you douse your statements with non-juvenile, adult, intellect. This is, simply, clear.

    If the definition of free-speech varies from person to person, it's relevant to point out that if we're going to be relativist, then the meaning of everything varies from person to person. How, pray tell, do the powers that be at wwp ever agree on precisely what this "free speech" that's propelling this thread to stardom is? Do you argue that it takes like-minded individuals to run this site? In fact, that is an issue to discuss: hierarchy. Why not follow that tangent briefly? Within the hierarchy of mods and lay posting plebes lies, definitely, an irony. We aren't all the same, it seems. Some have the power, some don't. And before you send me off to another board if I don't like this one, let me state I'm not looking elsewhere at the moment because just as I believe in free speech and your inherent stupidity in pretending you can break it, I'm betting you can't break down my free will either.

    My response to you was humorous, yes. Dramatic, not quite. Again, you're going after me when there is a lot of meat to pick off of the backbones of this whole discussion. (Shall I hold your hand?) Instead, you're dismissing every argument that "essentially" vexes your own life-view was "juvenile." agism now? First repression of expression, now this?

    Absurdism? You would go there. I'm starting to feel you out. In an existential crisis, you find few takers who'll gladly discuss the issues that haunt you at night, and you realize that taker could be me. Sorry to disappoint, eat your existential angst alone. I'm not coming home for dinner.
    • Like Like x 1
  12. veravendetter Member

  13. Anonymous Member

    and that they don't liek Mudips.
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Anonymous Member

    View attachment images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQTWsPhRN_L2v5JmldWQQECBBHsofjYH

  15. Anonymous Member

    Get a grip faggots.

    Some teenage fapper wanted to find the sauce of a pic of some other teenage fapper.

    He asked 4chan - they pointed him here for the Lulz, knowing full well he'd be told to FOADIAF.

    So the joke is on him. Clearly the channers knew he was retarded enough to start a thread posting a pic of a naked teenager and ask for help finding out more about it.

    And they also knew his thread would be b@ and butthurt would be served. But it was some naked teen.

    If you think finding the ID of a naked teen is what WWP is here for, regardless of its distant origins, then you need to Lurk Moar.

    Oh and fuck "Freedom of Speech according to the United States Contitution".

    Fuck it hard, in the mouth, then bawwww some more, faggots.
    • Like Like x 10
  16. Anonymous Member

    I don't think it was every about OP.
  17. They Told "OP" Don't You Ever Come Around Here
    Don't Wanna See Your Face, You Better Disappear
    The Fire's In Their Eyes And Their Words Are Really Clear
    So Beat It, Just Beat It

    come on children..
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Anonymous Member

    So it was previously butthurt faggots who are still butthurt many months later riding the coat-tails of another ZOMG THEY BALEETED MY FAPPAGE!! bawwwfest?

    Even more fucking tragic. Get back to Ebaumsworld and tell them how nasty and mean they are on WWP. And bawww some more.
    • Like Like x 3
  19. an0nim0uz Member

    You sound like a very sad panda.
    • Like Like x 2
  20. veravendetter Member

  21. Fuck. I'm just clicking "like" on a lot of shit here for teh lulz. But seriously, for those who are concerned some content here will be NSFW, here's a novel idea: DON'T COME HERE WHEN YOU'RE AT WORK!!! I don't go to porn sites at work. I don't go to SomethingAwful at work. And I don't come here when I'm at work.

    That said, we desperately need the Dome. The Dome was never good, but it was necessary.
    • Like Like x 4
  22. Ersatz Global Moderator

    What was the question?
    • Like Like x 1
  23. Why don't you go for a walk outside with your dick out and see how far claiming it was constitutionally protected speech will get you when you meet a policeman. That's exactly what you're arguing for here.
    This is neither SA or a porn site and hosting nsfw content is not integral to WWP's purpose, but being accessible is. Quite frankly I'm amazed that I had to type that.
    • Like Like x 1
  24. veravendetter Member

    Everyone put shoe on head
    • Like Like x 4
  25. Miranda Member

    Could someone please say "I was told to come to you" again?
    • Like Like x 1
  26. shoe_on_head_6.jpg

    • Like Like x 2
  27. Ersatz Global Moderator

    I was told to come to you. By Satan.
    • Like Like x 5
  28. anonymous612 Member

    for fuck sake, people. when you make an account you make a contract that you'll follow the rules -- whatever they may be -- or you'll gtfo.
    • Like Like x 4
  29. Miranda Member

    • Like Like x 1
  30. over9000OT Member

    I'm reading this at work.

    Just sayin'.
    • Like Like x 3
  31. True, and yet, plenty of stuff that is discussed here as a matter of course, while not being strictly NSFW, is also not entirely appropriate for a workplace environment. I'm sure you've read and contributed to the various threads about WBC, for example. Quite frankly I'm amazed that you had to overlook that.

    Tl;dr: If you think any website is not appropriate for viewing at work, DON'T. There. Butthurt averted.
  32. To clarify, I'm not defending the right of the OP to post nudes here. Besides, there are over 9000^3 websites that are far better suited to that purpose, such as 4chan. I am saying that any arguments about NSFW or controversial topics being verboten is more than a bit specious, especially when there are threads about pretty much every taboo in several societies. No nudes? Fine. I can understand that. But for all the moralfaggotry that occurs here, our roots are anti-political correctness. To deny that is to deny a fundamental part of this website. If there is a set of rules for this website, the first one should be "caveat emptor."
  33. You're trying to equate discussing current events with posting pictures of penises?
  34. No, I'm making the point that plenty of NSFW commentary occurs here, and that pretending otherwise is just silly. I've already expressed my opinion of the nude that started this thread of fail. However, when the thread started to become about complaining because this is somehow a new or unique way this could endanger someone's job, a history and current events lesson was in order. Many of the memes here, to an outsider, would be extremely offensive. The most obvious and ubiquitous is the use of the term "faggot" and its variants. Tell me, if anyone's boss read that over one's shoulder, how much longer would they stay employed?
  35. This is an argument over posting penises everything else is a strawman.
  36. Stila Liev Member

  37. What the fuck? Is that tofu "bacon"? Ugh.
  38. Anonymous Member

    • Like Like x 2
  39. Stila Liev Member

    strips of ersatz

    "wise beard man" said its OK
  40. RickAstley-thumb-300x258-82338.jpg
    • Like Like x 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors


Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins