You know Miranda, you're part of a community (Chanology) that enjoys using militaristic jargon and rhetoric all the time (raids, targets, war, destruction, ect, ect). In fact (this might be a bit before your time, I don't know when you came here) cameranonymous got taken down by a swat team because the statements he made looked like legitimate threats of violence to uninformed outsiders. Now of course all of that talk is meant not as an actual call to violence here. But if some crazy dude decided that it would be a good idea to "raid the fuck out of the org" and charged in swords akimbo, would it be right to hold WWP accountable for said crazy mofo's actions? You are right that the rhetoric comming from the fringe right has been useless and inflammatory. But when you start talking about culpability, that's pretty risky territory you're entering. I mean if someone is out there clearly issuing calls to violent action that's one thing. But using warlike imagery is different. Just my thoughts of course.