Customize

AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

Discussion in 'GoldBase' started by Smurf, Oct 22, 2009.

  1. birdlegs53 Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Actually the entire complaint must be served upon the defendents or the defendents' attorney of record. Usually a process server can do it or any non-party to the case.
  2. Kha Khan Member

    Docket and Available Documents: AO vs CoScivil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Riverside Superior Court: Docket And Available Online Documents in Case RIC538634 - Choquette v. Church of Scientology International

    You can keep track of this case, all calendared hearings, and obtain all available online documents (primarily Court Orders) at the above link.

    Docket as of this date:


    04/23/2010 8:30 AM DEPT. 10 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HEARING - Minutes

    01/21/2010 8:00 AM DEPT. CLERK NON-PROOF OF SERVICE (NON-APPEARANCE) HEARING - Minutes

    10/22/2009 CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL FILED. Not Applicable N/A

    10/22/2009 SUMMONS ISSUED ON COMPLAINT FILED 10/22/2009 OF FRANCOIS CHOQUETTE AND FILED. Not Applicable N/A

    10/22/2009 DIRECTLY ASSIGNED TO DEPARTMENT 10 FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.

    10/22/2009 NON PROOF OF SERVICE HEARING SET FOR 1/21/10 AT 8:00 IN DEPT CLERK

    10/22/2009 COMPLAINT FILED FAST TRACK - SUMMONS ISSUED. Not Applicable N/A


    ************

    ESMB Thread: Graham Berry serves Danny Dunigan with civil lawsuit

    /
  3. themadhair Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Aside from from the tinfoil introduction and aside from the accusation of genocide, the complaint actually reads quite well and describes events that have collaborating dox. The various events in the complain certainly paint a picture of deliberate harassment with scifag activity seeming to be the deliberate cause of that. There will be legal wangling to come but this is interesting as a start.
  4. Skeptic1337 Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    AO is gonna make bank!!!!!!
  5. Mutante Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    I certainly hope so; he owes me an orange.
  6. CantPickaName Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    and he is now my BFF
  7. TomVorm Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    AO's complaints states a case for compensation for emotional distress.

    In the past, cult attorneys have cited this sort of claim as grounds for a judicial order for Plaintiffs to have to submit to psychological testing (for an objective evaluation as to how much "emotional distress" someone has suffered).

    Plaintiffs who have been targeted with this order have been subject to an extensive, multi-day psychological inventory (including tens of invasive and embarrassing questions focusing on unrelated subjects, like their entire employment history, family relations, sexual history, and whatever drugs they have taken in the course of their life). Questions asked of Plaintiffs, read like a form of a sec check.

    Their detailed psych report then makes it way into the "public" section of the court case file.
  8. eddieVroom Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    IMO, it's nearly impossible to preface a discussion of the Happy Fun Cult's beliefs and motivations without coming off tinfoilly. And it's that discussion of Co$ considering itself above "wog law" (enshrined in sacred HCOPL's) which will support punative damages.

    All in all, looks to me like solid work, Graham.

    Here's wishing you Skill... :)
  9. YAHRLY Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    no she is 140 in dog years
  10. Smurf Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    You do, but Graham loves to throw his harpoons at them at let the turd wads know what their looking forward to.

    LOL.
  11. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    When did "orange" become a code word for "blow job"?
  12. Kha Khan Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Smurf, that is not correct. At least in California you have to serve the Summons, Complaint and any Orders issued by the Clerk's office (typically a scheduling order).
  13. the anti Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    he should use some of that to buy me a new computer
  14. Snake Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Oh good. Francois can buy himself another Eastern block wife.
  15. Olrik Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Scientology works and it helps people...
  16. Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Even if AO's case goes his way and he gets bank, you know that he will never seen anything soon. The Co$ will appeal this shit to the ground and try to get anything reduced. Plus the MoneyTech will never allow them to pay it when they're suppose to. You know how the Co$ don't like paying their bills on time.

    But good luck to AO anyway...
  17. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    What's the going rate? Just out of curiosity.
  18. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Stop calling Barb a dog. She's just a little rough round the edges :D
  19. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    you have obviously never have seen her IRL

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins