Customize

AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

Discussion in 'GoldBase' started by Smurf, Oct 22, 2009.

  1. Smurf Member

    Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    The civil lawsuit by AnonOrange against the Gold Base guards that arrested him, and the silly ass cult they work for...

    was filed today in Riverside County Superior Court...

    Case RIC538634 - CHOQUETTE VS CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL

    The first hearing is scheduled for 04/23/2010 - 8:30 AM - DEPT. 10.
  2. the_cloak Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    In b4 AO screws this up.
  3. T.W.C_Anon Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    WoOt!

    Good luck to AO, he will need it.

    I would like to see the complaint. DOX please.

    EDIT: Video of the papers being served also would be lulzy :D
  4. Anonymous Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    dear C'Thulu,
    please do not let this be another easily dismissed, rambling, insane sounding, filing by GB
  5. Anonymous Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    Yay! Looking forward to reading it and hearing reports about the claim being served. :)
  6. exOT8Michael Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    Will this include AO not doing the batshit crazy "lawnmower" gardening enhancement raid? Hopefully.
  7. Anonymous Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    Claim, moar liek CLAM amirite?

  8. WTF Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    Good luck Graham.


    Almost like representing one's self--fool for a client.
  9. Anonymous Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    Please don't let this be another cultie posting. Even if it probably is.
  10. RightOn Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    Go get 'em Graham!

    I still can't believe those goons were never arrested.
  11. A.Non Hubbard Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    If anyone can fuck this up it's AO. Good luck Graham.
  12. Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    ^^^ this

    (poasting drunk, logged in for the 1st time in 4 weeks just to say it)

    Go Gb Go!!!!!

    Anything that brings attention to goldbase and the happenings inside is relevant to my interests.
    (where'd my smilies go??!!??)
    also, meant to click the anonymous box, fuckit, CANDLEJA)

    Openning yet another 40oz and praying AO nevar returns to MTL!!!

    (mtlfag poasting drunk, and abusing the smiles)
    :confused:
  13. Anonymous Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    I would like to note for the record that this is not in anyway me.
  14. Anonymous Member

    AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    AnonOrange's lawsuit against the CoS for what happened when he was jumped by cult guards at Gold Base has been filed. The proper hearing is slated for April 23rd 2010.

    Case RIC538634 - [Orange Furry] VS CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL

    Viewed Date Action Text Disposition Image
    04/23/2010 8:30 AM DEPT. 10 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HEARING - Minutes
    01/21/2010 8:00 AM DEPT. CLERK NON-PROOF OF SERVICE (NON-APPEARANCE) HEARING - Minutes
    10/22/2009 CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL FILED. Not Applicable N/A
    10/22/2009 SUMMONS ISSUED ON COMPLAINT FILED 10/22/2009 OF FRANCOIS CHOQUETTE AND FILED. Not Applicable N/A
    10/22/2009 DIRECTLY ASSIGNED TO DEPARTMENT 10 FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.
    10/22/2009 NON PROOF OF SERVICE HEARING SET FOR 1/21/10 AT 8:00 IN DEPT CLERK
    10/22/2009 COMPLAINT FILED FAST TRACK - SUMMONS ISSUED. Not Applicable N/A
  15. SomeRandGuy Member

  16. Dog Duke Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    It was exciting for this little doggy to watch from the car.

    After he was served Danny just came to front of the guard house and stared silently at us as Grahamsie and Orange got back into the car and belted up to drive away. Poor Danny looked so stunned, sad and solitary. It looked as those his reality had just exploded and he would rather be coming with us than having to report that old Bulldog Berry had swooped in like some Batman wannabe and served the whole damn lot of them when they least expected. "Graham, you could have been shot," said AO to Graham. "Nah" he replied, "The sniper couldn't see me in the dark behind the car and I had the dox through the window before Danny could reach for his gun." Woof, woof.

    Watch the video.



    And keep checking AGPs site for the dox.
  17. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    nice
  18. WTF Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)


    You must have nicer service laws there than here. Uninvolved 3rd party is required here ;-/
  19. Graham Berry Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    The initial rough PDF of the Complaint and Exhibits is now at the Angry Gay Pope web site.

    A specific website will be built.

    Angry Gay Pope Home Page
  20. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    I really appreciate the lots of info you put together, but srsly guise, the design gives me eyecancer.
  21. Graham Berry Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    I did the service, as an attorney and an officer of the court. AO could not do it as a party. But he could video it.
  22. AnonOfStout Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    "Would you listen to me! You're on private property, LEAVE!"

    .....didn't they just lose that fight? Fucking failfag.

    I hate AO, but goddamn, they hate him more!
  23. wolfyrik Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    It's all good. You guys are amazing. Thanks for everything, GB :D
  24. SomeRandGuy Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    That video was awesome.

    I wonder why he didn't jump out of his booth and tackle him this time :D bwahaha
  25. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    I think it is lame serving papers at night. And in unprofessional manner (ie having AO there shouting crap and getting excited).

    Anyways, just FYI, only Bush uses the word "internets" and you keep attributing to stuff in the future. (ie. October 26, 2009 hasn't happened yet)

    Also, drop all the crap about what "Anonymous" is. You might mean Chanology.. and even then the idea is that there isn't really any official group. You look really stupid saying "Anonymous" is made up of police, military intelligence officers, and Congressional staffers. You can't really prove it.. If you mean people who protest scientology include.. blah blah.. But against WHAT DOES ANY OF THIS SHIT HAVE TO DO WITH HIS CASE? YOu really think Jonestown or North Korea gulag is relevant???

    Why not short and sweet and focus on a strong case and damages. Iknow the "background" can be quite superfluous and ignored... but whatever.
  26. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Berry, give the duke a pat on the head... fuckit, give him a belly scratch - it's well deserved.

    re the complaint - Good stuff - could pull back a bit on the floweriness I'd've thought esp at the beginning - do you run these things past some uninvolved legal eyes for feedback? If not, i'd recommend it - the same way I would when a developer writes an IT test plan - but IANAL so WTF do I know...

    up to Page 12 - "numbering more than 9000" - gave me wood.
  27. Graham Berry Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Statutes of limitations are expiring October 26. We want to keep the focus wide. They will try to narrow it. We may decide to do so later as well. You can be sure there will be demurrers, motions to strike, amended complaints, etc. Meanwhile all appropriate causes of action have been preserved. There are also other strategic considerations in play. Scientology cases have their own strategic moves. You will see many of them unfold over the coming weeks.
  28. the anti Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    i can't help but to think how funny that is
  29. Smurf Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    LOL. Dumb Danny in his hillbilly drawl at 0:25, "Hey, will you just listen to me for a second?"

    And did you see all the computers in the guardshack monitoring all the cameras??
  30. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    You know what this means!!! DISCOVERY
  31. Rhamni Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Heh.
  32. Anonymous Member

  33. Anonymous Member

  34. anonymous1312 Member

    Re: Graham files lawsuit vs. Gold Base guards in Riverside Court..

    Nearly choked with rage when I read "filed" as "failed". Thank goodness I read it twice.

    Good luck to AO and GB et al.
  35. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Good thing no one asked for your opinion!
  36. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    I love how he use certain words against the scientologists, I wont discuss it here because the scilons always look into these forums trying to get an edge. I just love the way Graham thinks, he is so crafty. Everybody please dont spoil the case!!
  37. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Scientology is trying to weasel their way out of things. Not this time, the world is watching. Please document all cases of fair game with video and what not because you are going to stronger case if they do.

    Scientology dont play these bitch games, you will get caught one way or another. You are stuck in a rock and a hard place.

    And as for this case goes: AO needs to be on his best behavior.
  38. AnonOfStout Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    They're stuck in a mineral incident.
  39. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    Lol - anon: helping bringing down the cult every which way...
  40. Anonymous Member

    Re: AO vs CoS civil suit over assault/arrest (RIC538634)

    It's okay Barb, you're not old yet!

    Oh, hang on...

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Close

Choose a color via Color picker or click the predefined style names!

Primary Color :

Secondary Color :
Predefined Skins