Re: 12/15/09 BOS Saying "AT LEAST HE'S DOING SOMETHING!" is really not a valid response to critiques of AO's fucktardery. If someone is acting a fool, it doesn't matter who points it out. The other problem is the assumption that AO is doing something in the slightest bit effective. All he does is get up and stammer and make a fool out of himself. If anything, his performances up there hurt anybody trying to call scientology to task because he makes all critics look insane.
Re: 12/15/09 BOS Like people who do something, AO makes mistakes. It is the privilege of those like you who do nothing but talk to avoid mistakes...
Re: 12/15/09 BOS Believe it or not, people like Herro who poke holes in our arguments is beneficial, as it allows us to revise the way we do things. If Herro doesn't do it, then the Scientologists will, and to a much more harmful degree to us. Granted, Herro has gone above and beyond poking holes lately to flat-out trolling and shitposting, but I digress. But back to the topic at hand, AO is one of the biggest tumors of the cancer that's killing Chanology. Not only has he made a complete ass out of himself which reflects poorly on the entire community of critics, but he has broken the cardinal rule of protesting Scientology by doxing Anons. What he is doing here does not change that, and I know I am not the only one who thinks that.
Re: 12/15/09 BOS Believe it or not, I could have written most of what you say myself. It does not change what I said in my previous post.
