“The Whole Field is Disaffected”

Kha Khan · Nov 19, 2009

“The Whole Field is Disaffected”

Leaving Scientology: “The Whole Field is Disaffected”:

by rebel008

And that’s not me saying it, that’s the MAA of one of the Sea Org Orgs in LA.

This same MAA reported that the majority of OT VIIs and VIIIs have now stopped supporting David Miscavige’s “Ideal Org” program.

A special unit has now been set up at the CLO specifically to handle disaffected public. And that’s a major undertaking as it is, according to their own reports, virtually the entire field.

The Dir I & R at the CLO couldn’t handle it. He got doors slammed in his face more times than he could count.

When one OT didn’t open her front gate to two CLO staff who came to her home, unannounced, they jumped the gate. When the OT objected, they reported her as “disaffected” and she was called in for an interview.

Staff members, wake up.

When the top level, OT Scientologists are mostly disaffected…

When top level former staff and Sea Org executives are disaffected…

When former productive Mission Holders are disaffected…

When former top auditors and C/Ses are disaffected…

…maybe, just maybe, there is something to be disaffected about.

Maybe there is something very, very wrong with David Miscavige’s Church of Scientology.

ESMB Thread: “The Whole Field is Disaffected”

_You_ · Nov 19, 2009

Re: “The Whole Field is Disaffected”

Thanks
Desperate cult is desperate

basil · Nov 19, 2009

Re: “The Whole Field is Disaffected”

Keep it up Miscavige. The more you push people, the more you piss them off, the more their humanity is going to break through their brainwashing, and they start to wake up and realise that there is something very, very wrong with this cult.

_You_ · Nov 19, 2009

Re: “The Whole Field is Disaffected”

By way of Kha Khan:

[strike]Maybe[/strike] there is something very, very wrong with [strike]David Miscavige’s[/strike] [strike]Church of[/strike] Scientology.

fixd

Kha Khan · Nov 19, 2009

Re: “The Whole Field is Disaffected”

Interesting, the consensus on LS is that the COS is going to use Rollback Tech. Perhaps the best descriptions are in these posts:

Probably with “Rollbacks” which would lead to David Miscavige. (Rollback: This type of experience includes (still conducted on the Scientology electro-psychometer) the “roll back” process. This is a procedure in which certain situations or events or moods are traced back in time during a one-on-one discussion. Who has said what to you? When? Where? And where could he have learned that from? Whom have you told? A systematic interrogation with the goal of rolling up all the threads of information which could eventually be damaging for Scientology. These are followed back until the origination point is found and the person or people concerned can be “handled” with other methods, from Scientology with(out) an End by Tom Voltz )

This is exactly what they will do. First they will survey the staff for all the “enemy lines” and “backflash” they are getting from the public. Then they will order the specific public persons who uttered these “lines” to come in. They will then put these people on the meter to find out who has been in their ear and influencing them to think and say such things. Or they will go to the person’s house with a meter, muscle their way in and do the interview in the home. This goes on and on — rolling back many people — until they “find” the specific persons in the field who are source of the enemy lines. It’s called “roll back” because the procedure is meant to take these enemy lines and “roll them back” to the actual source that is spreading the lines. From the org’s viewpoint, they are looking for some evil horrible person in the field that has got everyone all stirred up. When they find the person, he or she will be publicly declared and everybody is supposed to be all relieved when they see where all this was coming from. In this case, such efforts are futile as of course it all goes back to how the org is treating the field with the new Miscavology way of delivering squirrel tech while invalidating and fleecing the public for more and more money. And of course RTC is always behind these off-policy rollback “field clean-ups.” It will turn into yet another way of blaming the public for their rejection of being abused by the organization. LRH said all org stats are internally caused. Well, that includes the stat of “number of disaffected public in the field.” It’s the org applying Miscavology to the field that is causing all this, so this action by the CLO is going to blow up very badly. If they think they have a mutiny on their hands now, they ain’t seen nothin’ yet….

Rollback is the subject of several HCOBs that are restricted and so not available to the general public. It’s actually a very smart tech. It’s the way to trace back something to its source. LRH began developing it in 1982 and there are a lot more than 2 advices about it.

It is simply a matter of taking a piece of information and asking the person who told it to you, who he or she heard it from. Then you go to THAT person and find out where he or she heard it from and so on back to the point where it won’t roll back any further. That’s the person who started it. That’s basically all there is to it.

For years, people doing rollbacks simply used the LRH advices on it. Then RTRC compiled them into HCOBs in the early 90s.

Right now Int/OSA/DM & Co. are undoubtedly trying to assemble a picture of the “network” out here in the field that is aiming to take down the church. In some office there are huge charts listing out who is connected to who and the few people (remember, OSA has been decimated in recent years) engaged in this effort are quickly realizing that things are spiraling out of control. For them it’s Warp Speed Whack-A-Mole 24/7. Those situations are not fun until the sheer randomity overwhelms you and you go into the glee of insanity and then, because you’ve stopped ridging, you can sort of enjoy it.

Unless you’re out here helping to create it on a hobby basis.

The Rollback system has several flaws. One is that staff soon learn not to be the last person on the chain. If a bit of “Black PR” is traced to a specific staff member, they will find someone else to pass it back to so they are not found as the initial source of it. So it tends to become a rolling blame game. Secondly, the possibility that criticism of a senior Scientology executive is actually justified is not part of the equation. Whatever its original intention. Rollback is now used to track down and quash any criticism of those in power. Some might say that was always its purpose.

anoninoob · Nov 19, 2009

Re: “The Whole Field is Disaffected”

Ah, the cracks widen.

Once again, we run this.

Log in or Sign up

“The Whole Field is Disaffected”

Kha Khan Member

_You_ Member

basil Member

_You_ Member

Kha Khan Member

anoninoob Member

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Predefined Skins